Human Relations Contributors
Douglas McGregor
Theory X and Theory Y
Douglas McGregor in his book, "The Human Side of Enterprise" published in 1960
has examined theories on behavior of individuals at work, and he has formulated
two models which he calls Theory X and Theory Y.
Theory X Assumptions
The average human being has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if he
can.
Because of their dislike for work, most people must be controlled and
threatened before they will work hard enough.
The average human prefers to be directed, dislikes responsibility, is
unambiguous, and desires security above everything.
These assumptions lie behind most organizational principles today, and give
rise both to "tough" management with punishments and tight controls, and
"soft" management which aims at harmony at work.
Both these are "wrong" because man needs more than financial rewards at work,
he also needs some deeper higher order motivation - the opportunity to fulfill
himself.
Theory X managers do not give their staff this opportunity so that the
employees behave in the expected fashion.
Theory Y Assumptions
The expenditure of physical and mental effort in work is as natural as play or
rest.
Control and punishment are not the only ways to make people work, man will
direct himself if he is committed to the aims of the organization.
If a job is satisfying, then the result will be commitment to the
organization.
The average man learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept but to
seek responsibility.
Imagination, creativity, and ingenuity can be used to solve work problems by a
large number of employees.
Under the conditions of modern industrial life, the intellectual
potentialities of the average man are only partially utilized.
Comments on Theory X and Theory Y Assumptions
These assumptions are based on social science research which has been carried
out, and demonstrate the potential which is present in man and which
organizations should recognize in order to become more effective.
McGregor sees these two theories as two quite separate attitudes. Theory Y is
difficult to put into practice on the shop floor in large mass production
operations, but it can be used initially in the managing of managers and
professionals.
In "The Human Side of Enterprise" McGregor shows how Theory Y affects the
management of promotions and salaries and the development of effective managers.
McGregor also sees Theory Y as conducive to participative problem solving.
It is part of the manager's job to exercise authority, and there are cases in
which this is the only method of achieving the desired results because
subordinates do not agree that the ends are desirable.
However, in situations where it is possible to obtain commitment to objectives,
it is better to explain the matter fully so that employees grasp the purpose of
an action. They will then exert self-direction and control to do better work -
quite possibly by better methods - than if they had simply been carrying out an
order which the y did not fully understand.
The situation in which employees can be consulted is one where the individuals
are emotionally mature, and positively motivated towards their work; where the
work is sufficiently responsible to allow for flexibility and where the employee
can see her or his own position in the management hierarchy. If these conditions
are present, managers will find that the participative approach to problem
solving leads to much improved results compared with the alternative approach of
handing out authoritarian orders.
Once management becomes persuaded that it is under estimating the potential of
its human resources, and accepts the knowledge given by social science
researchers and displayed in Theory Y assumptions, then it can invest time,
money and effort in developing improved applications of the theory.
McGregor realizes that some of the theories he has put forward are unrealizable
in practice, but wants managers to put into operation the basic assumption that:
Staff will contribute more to the organization if they are treated as
responsible and valued employees.
Motivation is the process that initiates, guides, and maintains goal-oriented behaviors. McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y proposed contrasting views of employees: Theory X assumes that employees are inherently lazy and need to be closely monitored, while Theory Y assumes that employees are self-motivated and can excel if given the right conditions. McGregor's contribution was significant as it laid the groundwork for understanding different approaches to managing and motivating employees, highlighting the importance of leadership styles in enhancing motivation and performance.
Thinking critically in the writing process allows the writer to carefully evaluate their ideas, arguments, and evidence. It helps ensure that the writing is logical, well-structured, and effectively communicates the intended message. By challenging assumptions, considering alternative perspectives, and analyzing information, critical thinking can lead to stronger, more persuasive writing.
Accuracy. Online research can sometimes lack credibility and quality control, leading to the dissemination of inaccurate or biased information. It's important to critically evaluate sources to ensure the information obtained is reliable.
Unschooling can be a valid educational approach for some families, as it allows children to pursue their interests and learn at their own pace. However, its effectiveness can vary depending on the child's motivation, parental involvement, and access to resources. It's important for parents considering unschooling to carefully evaluate whether it aligns with their child's needs and learning style.
Academic credibility is essential for critical thinking as it involves evaluating information from reputable and reliable sources. Engaging with credible academic sources helps individuals develop a more informed and well-rounded perspective, allowing them to critically analyze and evaluate information effectively. By considering evidence-based research and scholarly work, individuals can enhance their critical thinking skills and make informed decisions.
They are similar but not exactly the same. "Evaluate" typically involves making judgments or assessments, while "analyze" involves breaking something down into its parts or examining closely. In a paper, you might analyze specific elements or components in order to evaluate the overall topic or issue.
describe and critically evaluate the major model of mental health
to evaluate something critically
Creative talent
Critically analyze means to evaluate and judge a specific thing based on a certain set of standards. The important thing is evaluate all areas and then be completely honest of what fell short of what was expected.
guard and refine your worldview as you choose.
Media messages create the illusion that what is being presented is real.
ask david fisher. he will know
Historians were influenced by scientists to evaluate their sources more critically
Media messages create the illusion that what is being presented is real.
• About Lakshmi Mittal Background to the organisation and the business leader with a justification of your choice. • Explain the meaning of strategic leadership and importance to the selected organisation. • Contrast the main approaches to the study of leadership and the approach relevant to the organisation. • Critically evaluate the role of the leader in developing strategy. • Critically explore the exercise of leadership power and influence. • Critically review the importance of ethics, values and corporate social responsibilities to an organisations value. • Critically evaluate leadership and sustainability concepts and trends. • Background to the organisation and the business leader with a justification of your choice. • Explain the meaning of strategic leadership and importance to the selected organisation. • Contrast the main approaches to the study of leadership and the approach relevant to the organisation. • Critically evaluate the role of the leader in developing strategy. • Critically explore the exercise of leadership power and influence. • Critically review the importance of ethics, values and corporate social responsibilities to an organisations value. • Critically evaluate leadership and sustainability concepts and trends.
You can think about what they are trying to sell. What demographic are they reaching. Can the product really do what they claim?
keep control over your own worldview.