answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Human Relations Contributors

Douglas McGregor

Theory X and Theory Y

Douglas McGregor in his book, "The Human Side of Enterprise" published in 1960

has examined theories on behavior of individuals at work, and he has formulated

two models which he calls Theory X and Theory Y.

Theory X Assumptions

The average human being has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if he

can.

Because of their dislike for work, most people must be controlled and

threatened before they will work hard enough.

The average human prefers to be directed, dislikes responsibility, is

unambiguous, and desires security above everything.

These assumptions lie behind most organizational principles today, and give

rise both to "tough" management with punishments and tight controls, and

"soft" management which aims at harmony at work.

Both these are "wrong" because man needs more than financial rewards at work,

he also needs some deeper higher order motivation - the opportunity to fulfill

himself.

Theory X managers do not give their staff this opportunity so that the

employees behave in the expected fashion.

Theory Y Assumptions

The expenditure of physical and mental effort in work is as natural as play or

rest.

Control and punishment are not the only ways to make people work, man will

direct himself if he is committed to the aims of the organization.

If a job is satisfying, then the result will be commitment to the

organization.

The average man learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept but to

seek responsibility.

Imagination, creativity, and ingenuity can be used to solve work problems by a

large number of employees.

Under the conditions of modern industrial life, the intellectual

potentialities of the average man are only partially utilized.

Comments on Theory X and Theory Y Assumptions

These assumptions are based on social science research which has been carried

out, and demonstrate the potential which is present in man and which

organizations should recognize in order to become more effective.

McGregor sees these two theories as two quite separate attitudes. Theory Y is

difficult to put into practice on the shop floor in large mass production

operations, but it can be used initially in the managing of managers and

professionals.

In "The Human Side of Enterprise" McGregor shows how Theory Y affects the

management of promotions and salaries and the development of effective managers.

McGregor also sees Theory Y as conducive to participative problem solving.

It is part of the manager's job to exercise authority, and there are cases in

which this is the only method of achieving the desired results because

subordinates do not agree that the ends are desirable.

However, in situations where it is possible to obtain commitment to objectives,

it is better to explain the matter fully so that employees grasp the purpose of

an action. They will then exert self-direction and control to do better work -

quite possibly by better methods - than if they had simply been carrying out an

order which the y did not fully understand.

The situation in which employees can be consulted is one where the individuals

are emotionally mature, and positively motivated towards their work; where the

work is sufficiently responsible to allow for flexibility and where the employee

can see her or his own position in the management hierarchy. If these conditions

are present, managers will find that the participative approach to problem

solving leads to much improved results compared with the alternative approach of

handing out authoritarian orders.

Once management becomes persuaded that it is under estimating the potential of

its human resources, and accepts the knowledge given by social science

researchers and displayed in Theory Y assumptions, then it can invest time,

money and effort in developing improved applications of the theory.

McGregor realizes that some of the theories he has put forward are unrealizable

in practice, but wants managers to put into operation the basic assumption that:

Staff will contribute more to the organization if they are treated as

responsible and valued employees.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

12h ago

Motivation is the process that initiates, guides, and maintains goal-oriented behaviors. McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y proposed contrasting views of employees: Theory X assumes that employees are inherently lazy and need to be closely monitored, while Theory Y assumes that employees are self-motivated and can excel if given the right conditions. McGregor's contribution was significant as it laid the groundwork for understanding different approaches to managing and motivating employees, highlighting the importance of leadership styles in enhancing motivation and performance.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Define motivation critically evaluate contribution of Mcgregor to motivation?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Educational Theory

How can thinking critically influence the writing process?

Thinking critically in the writing process allows the writer to carefully evaluate their ideas, arguments, and evidence. It helps ensure that the writing is logical, well-structured, and effectively communicates the intended message. By challenging assumptions, considering alternative perspectives, and analyzing information, critical thinking can lead to stronger, more persuasive writing.


What word best summarizes one of the problems with online research?

Accuracy. Online research can sometimes lack credibility and quality control, leading to the dissemination of inaccurate or biased information. It's important to critically evaluate sources to ensure the information obtained is reliable.


Is unschooling bad?

Unschooling can be a valid educational approach for some families, as it allows children to pursue their interests and learn at their own pace. However, its effectiveness can vary depending on the child's motivation, parental involvement, and access to resources. It's important for parents considering unschooling to carefully evaluate whether it aligns with their child's needs and learning style.


How does academic credibility relates to critical thinking?

Academic credibility is essential for critical thinking as it involves evaluating information from reputable and reliable sources. Engaging with credible academic sources helps individuals develop a more informed and well-rounded perspective, allowing them to critically analyze and evaluate information effectively. By considering evidence-based research and scholarly work, individuals can enhance their critical thinking skills and make informed decisions.


Does evaluate and analyze mean the same thing when you are writing a paper?

They are similar but not exactly the same. "Evaluate" typically involves making judgments or assessments, while "analyze" involves breaking something down into its parts or examining closely. In a paper, you might analyze specific elements or components in order to evaluate the overall topic or issue.

Related questions

Describe and critically evaluate the major models of mental health and their value bases?

describe and critically evaluate the major model of mental health


What is critical evaluation?

to evaluate something critically


Which trait is necessary to critically evaluate evidence?

Creative talent


What does critically analyze mean?

Critically analyze means to evaluate and judge a specific thing based on a certain set of standards. The important thing is evaluate all areas and then be completely honest of what fell short of what was expected.


You should critically evaluate the media texts you encounter so that you can?

guard and refine your worldview as you choose.


Why is necessary to critically evaluate media messages?

Media messages create the illusion that what is being presented is real.


Critically evaluate the concept of maximising shareholder wealth and competing theories?

ask david fisher. he will know


What was the significance of the scientific revolution of the study of history?

Historians were influenced by scientists to evaluate their sources more critically


Why is it critically necessary to evaluate media messages?

Media messages create the illusion that what is being presented is real.


Lakshmi mittal leadership style?

• About Lakshmi Mittal Background to the organisation and the business leader with a justification of your choice. • Explain the meaning of strategic leadership and importance to the selected organisation. • Contrast the main approaches to the study of leadership and the approach relevant to the organisation. • Critically evaluate the role of the leader in developing strategy. • Critically explore the exercise of leadership power and influence. • Critically review the importance of ethics, values and corporate social responsibilities to an organisations value. • Critically evaluate leadership and sustainability concepts and trends. • Background to the organisation and the business leader with a justification of your choice. • Explain the meaning of strategic leadership and importance to the selected organisation. • Contrast the main approaches to the study of leadership and the approach relevant to the organisation. • Critically evaluate the role of the leader in developing strategy. • Critically explore the exercise of leadership power and influence. • Critically review the importance of ethics, values and corporate social responsibilities to an organisations value. • Critically evaluate leadership and sustainability concepts and trends.


What is one way to evaluate a commercial critically?

You can think about what they are trying to sell. What demographic are they reaching. Can the product really do what they claim?


It's important to critically evaluate the media texts you encounter in order to?

keep control over your own worldview.