i think it is 1
find out yo self dummie! ha
v
It could be but not necessarily. It is just a value and could represent that quantity of anything.
No, it could be a qualitative variable.
30 is an integer and the only sensible way to represent it is as an integer: 30 minutes. The is no obvious requirement to change the measurement units. If this is required then you need to specify the units into which the quantity is to be converted This is particularly important in in this case where the convenient unit might be an hour but the SI standard is a second. Or you could be thinking of degrees, minutes and seconds.
You could write it as a mixed number (12 and 4/4) but it wouldn't be in simplest form. The simplest form of any integer is the integer itself.
16939 is an integer and not a fraction. There is no sensible way to represent it as a mixed number, although if pushed, you could try 16939 0/n where n is any non-zero integer.
It is an integer, not a fraction, but if you must, you could write it as 147000/1.It is an integer, not a fraction, but if you must, you could write it as 147000/1.It is an integer, not a fraction, but if you must, you could write it as 147000/1.It is an integer, not a fraction, but if you must, you could write it as 147000/1.
A champagne quantity could be called a "split"
3 and 3
Sure, on a bar graph, each bar represents a quantity of something. If the entire graph is for a certain product, then each bar could represent the quantity sold each month. Or the entire graph could be for a particular month, with each bar representing sales during that month, for different products.
An integer is a whole number. So zero could be the smallest integer.