0
Did Aristotle and Ptolemy both reason that the celestial bodies must be provided with a source of motion?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Yes
true
Anonymous
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What cannot be used to study the celestial bodies?
A banana cannot be used to study the celestial bodies.
Other celestial bodies in space?
Celestial bodies include stars, planets, galaxies, nebulae, comets, meteoroids, satellites, and asteroids.
Force that attracts celestial bodies?
The force that attracts celestial bodies is the same force that keeps your feet on the ground. It's called gravity.
Is Astronomy the study of celestial bodies?
Yes
What kind of celestial body is the International Space Station?
The Space Station is no a celestial body. Celestial bodies are natural -- not man made.
Did Aristotle and Ptolemy reason that the celestial bodies must be provided with a source of motion?
it is true
Did Aristotle believe in geocentric or heliocentric?
Aristotle believed in a geocentric model, where the Earth is at the center of the universe, with celestial bodies revolving around it.
Ptolemy modified Aristotle's model of the universe to include?
Aristotle's model of the solar system was geocentric, meaning that everything in the solar system revolved around Earth. Ptolemy added in the way the planetary bodies moved, although they still moved geocentrically.
Do paleontologists study celestial bodies?
No Astronomers study celestial bodies
Information about dates on which certain celestial bodies were seen?
Dates on which celestial bodies were seen
What cannot be used to study the celestial bodies?
A banana cannot be used to study the celestial bodies.
Date on which celestial bodies like mars comets were seen?
information about dates on which certain celestial bodies
Does mars have celestial bodies?
no it does not
What is the celestial bodies?
Astronomist
How did Aristotle believe in the solar system?
Aristotle noticed that everything moves itself or was moved by something else. Since observation fails to disclose something moving stars and planets, Aristotle concludes that these bodies move themselves. Anything moving itself must be alive, for that is how it moves itself, so Aristotle concludes that stars and planets must be alive.
Were aristotle's predictions of heavenly motion quantitative or qualitative?
Aristotle's predictions of heavenly motion were qualitative rather than quantitative. He described the motion of celestial bodies in terms of their natural behavior and relationships rather than using mathematical equations or measurements.
What is the professions celestial bodies?
Astronomist
