answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, Jefferson argued with the necessary addition to the constitution. This is because he felt he had to protect the people from the abuses of power and government.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did Jefferson argue with the necessary addition to the constitution and why?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What did The Federalist argue about the constitution?

About Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson


What did president Jefferson argue that the job of deciding what the constitution meant?

elected leaders (apex)


Why did antifederalists argue against ratification of the constitution?

it had no bill of rights


Is US Constitution reflects ideas that us was founded on?

You could argue that.


How did the president violate the constitution by making Louisiana purchase?

It was violated because it did not say anywhere in the Constitution that the president could buy or sell land, But after much consideration he did make the settlement. The argument can be made that the Louisiana Purchase by President Jefferson was unconstitutional since there are no rights listed for the President to expand the borders of the United States. Supporters of this action however argue that Jefferson was acting as a treaty with France and Spain in the purchase and therefore it was constitutional.


How did the president violate the Constitution by making the Louisiana Purchase?

It was violated because it did not say anywhere in the Constitution that the president could buy or sell land, But after much consideration he did make the settlement. The argument can be made that the Louisiana Purchase by President Jefferson was unconstitutional since there are no rights listed for the President to expand the borders of the United States. Supporters of this action however argue that Jefferson was acting as a treaty with France and Spain in the purchase and therefore it was constitutional.


Why did the anti-Federalists argue against the Constitution?

The anti federalists werent against the constitution, they were with it.


What were some problems with the constitution?

people argue sometimes. Thats just the way it is.


Why did thurgood marshall argue the 14th amendment?

he wanted to prove it was a law, and it was in the constitution


Who argue that the Articles of Confederation were too weak and that the constitution would solve the problem?

Federalists


Why election not necessary?

It is not necessary because the people just argue about something that is simple they should just stop arguing and work together!


Which constitutional idea did Alexander Hamilton use to argue for the ability to collect taxes?

Necessary and proper