Yes he did. He had a stronghold in his house
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
name the famous city where king Arthur lived happy land
Britain.
King Arthur is said to have lived in Camelot, a legendary city in Arthurian folklore. Camelot is often portrayed as a mythical and majestic place where King Arthur held court with his Knights of the Round Table.
king Arthur was believed to have lived in the 15 century
ad 500
The birthplace of King Arthur is a subject of debate and legend. Some believe he was born in Tintagel Castle in Cornwall, England, while others claim he was born in Cadbury Castle in Somerset. The true location remains uncertain and is part of the mythology surrounding King Arthur.
All accounts place most of Arthur's life and Arthur's death in the island of Great Britain. Of course the chronicles disagree on exactly where the battle between Arthur and Modret occurred, that battle after which Arthur soon vanished. The Prose Percevalhowever places that battle in Ireland, apparently from a mention in Wace that Modret was retreating towards Ireland.
King Arthur is character of folklore. If he had lived, as supposed ruler of Britain he would have been Christian.
King Arthur is traditionally associated with Camelot as the palace where he lived. However, Camelot is a legendary and mythical place, and there is no concrete historical evidence of its existence.
Yes.
Arthur is a LEGEND. He was not born, he is a story that grew. If there was a real Arthur, he lived some time between 400 and 800AD.