King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
Alice Graham
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoAll accounts place most of Arthur's life and Arthur's death in the island of Great Britain. Of course the chronicles disagree on exactly where the battle between Arthur and Modret occurred, that battle after which Arthur soon vanished. The Prose Percevalhowever places that battle in Ireland, apparently from a mention in Wace that Modret was retreating towards Ireland.
King Arthur is character of folklore. If he had lived, as supposed ruler of Britain he would have been Christian.
#
In the book (The Once And Future King) they called him Wart or Art befor he was king. It is likely he was called Artorius when he lived.
Medieval times, but if he did exist, he would have lived in the 500's, probably as some warlord who saved his kingdom from invaders at a time.
name the famous city where king Arthur lived happy land
Arthur is a LEGEND. He was not born, he is a story that grew. If there was a real Arthur, he lived some time between 400 and 800AD.
Britain.
All accounts place most of Arthur's life and Arthur's death in the island of Great Britain. Of course the chronicles disagree on exactly where the battle between Arthur and Modret occurred, that battle after which Arthur soon vanished. The Prose Percevalhowever places that battle in Ireland, apparently from a mention in Wace that Modret was retreating towards Ireland.
King Arthur is a famous British leader of legend. He lived in the court of Camelot. His wife was Guinevere.
He couldn't have since King Arthur is believed to have lived some time during the 6th century and the Vikings did not start raiding until the 8th.
king Arthur was believed to have lived in the 15 century
ad 500
King Arthur was king of Britain
Yes he did. He had a stronghold in his house
King Arthur is character of folklore. If he had lived, as supposed ruler of Britain he would have been Christian.
Camelot was where King Arthur lived. In present day, some believe it is Tintangel, a coastal castle in western England.