Yes, he meant to kill all those people. Maybe not at the start because he wanted to just industrialize China. But I doubt he cared after 15 million people died. Mao Zedong is worse than Hitler.
*I have to disagree with the above.*
More people died in China because far more people lived there.
Mao wanted to rapidly industrialize the nation, so he sent many farmers to do industrial work. Because of that, not enough food was being produced. This, in combination with bad weather conditions (floods and extreme drought) caused severe famine.
In 1959, the Yellow River flooded, which directly killed, either through starvation from crop failure or drowning, an estimated 2 million people. While other areas were affected in other ways as well. (Wikipedia)
Although many millions died, only a small percentage died from violence, the vast majority simply starved to death.
His policies failed. For instance, he launched the 'Four Pests Campaign'.
One of the pests that was to be exterminated, because they ate some of the grains, was the Eurasian Tree Sparrow. Before the leadership realised it, it caused great ecological inbalance, locust populations exploded, and swarmed the country. Making the situation even worse, instead of better.
I'm not saying he was a good person, he very much wanted to be in power, and anyone who disagreed with him would be prosecuted. He was a fool, and many people died because of that. However, to say he was worse than Hitler (or Stalin for that matter), is insane.
Hope this helped.
Nothing, those things are fake and nothing happens. If you do not forward one to like let's say 10 people, nothing will happen.
Isaac Asimov
Darren smith
Isaac Asimov
Darren smith
nobody guards the great wall of china
Nothing, the world, for all intents and purposes, has ended for those people. They have nothing to look forward to except unending despair and indescribable pain.
It was started by people who were prisoners or those who were having a rough time in Europe. In the beginning it was scotish people moving there to sell tobacco.
Given the great variety of religious practices, and the great variety of people who engage in those practices, and the great variety of interpretations which that great variety of people make about the great variety of religious practices that they practice, the answer is, it can mean just about anything.
Given the great variety of religious practices, and the great variety of people who engage in those practices, and the great variety of interpretations which that great variety of people make about the great variety of religious practices that they practice, the answer is, it can mean just about anything.
Those that stayed loyal to the Crown were called Loyalists.
You might be referring to those in debtor's prisons?