Want this question answered?
it means that if you say someone killed someone and someone seen you killed that proson and you have prof that is what you evidence.
The only clergyman who effectively opposed the witchcraft trials in Salem Village was Reverend Increase Mather. He urged for caution and demanded more concrete evidence before accusing someone of witchcraft. Despite facing criticism and accusations himself, Mather's efforts played a significant role in ultimately ending the trials.
The afflicted believed to have seen the spectors of the accused and been tormented by them. Spectral Evidence is the girls' claims that the spectors harmed them that were heard in court. It's like witness testimony about ghosts.
You would not ask General Motors to name the best car in the world, since they manufacture automobiles. You would ask an independent authority, presumably someone who knows the facts. He would give you independent evidence, that is, independent of the source that is the subject of the question.
the fear of communism after WW2 was because of Robert f**king menzies so yeah maybe someone elso should have a go at answering this questions thanks anyweyz
To incriminate someone means to provide evidence or information that suggests their involvement in a crime or wrongful act. This can happen through witness statements, physical evidence, or other types of proof that implicate the person in question.
The "Witch Hunts" were methods employed by Conservative Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy during the cold war. He basically said he had a list of Communist sympathizers that were able to infiltrate the government, these claims were however, unfounded, which eventually lead to his censure and political decline as fellow Conservatives and Republicans saw him as a liability. The term McCarthyism means to accuse someone of disloyalty, treason, and/or subversion without evidence. People who questioned McCarthyists were branded as communists, traitors, etc.
Insinuation. Ever here someone remark "What are you insinuating??" in response to an accusing question?
Make sure you have concrete evidence before accusing someone of that position of something like that. If you believe you have solid evidence, I would call the nearest FBI office and hand that information over to them.
If someone is falsely accusing you of hacking their account, it would be best to gather evidence to prove your innocence. However, filing a case against them may not be necessary unless they continue to make false accusations and it is causing harm to your reputation or well-being. In such cases, you may consider consulting with a lawyer to explore your options for defamation or harassment.
If someone is accusing someone of being up on a high horse it means that they're accusing them of being proud or thinking they're better then everyone else. Thus if you're telling someone to get off their high horse you are telling them to stop being proud.
When can someone be held for defamation of character or accusing you of something very wrong that you did not do?
1. To legally charge (someone) with an offense or crime. 2. To claim that (someone) has done something wrong.
The Defendent is "being accused", therefore defending one's self
It's the difference between accusing someone of a crime and actually convicting that person. Allegations would be "RCMP have arrested Bob King, who allegedly killed his wife last month." Evidence in that case would be bloody clothes, murder weapon, etc. Basically, any physical sign that the person committed that crime.
If you make false accusations, they can sue you for slander.
it means that if you say someone killed someone and someone seen you killed that proson and you have prof that is what you evidence.