Yes, in fact some Roman slaves were better off financially than the freeborn poor, especially the domestic slaves. Every slave was entitled to have his "peculium" or savings. Slaves would be given gifts of money at Saturnalia, they would be given tips if they did an errand for someone who was not their master. It was customary for a visitor to tip any slaves that were assigned to escort him home after a dinner. It was a foolish Roman, indeed, who declined to tip a doorman, who although a slave, had the power to slam the door in his face and leave him standing in the street, while he went to see if his master would see the unexpected visitor.
Slaves didn't get paid. They got a weak supply for the necessities of their survival, and they weren't citizens either.
The first Romans used Salt as currency.
Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.
yes 1 person could have up 2 about 400 slaves
they were
no
roman citizens, non citizens, and slaves
The gladiators were slaves. They did not get paid. They lived at gladiatorial schools and were kept by their trainers.
the people who paid the roman games where first the Americans and then the egyptians because they were slaves of rome.
Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.
slaves don't get paid they're slaves
Slaves get paid nothing.
They where payed with food if they hwre poor or slaves and if they where a little wealthy they got coins
Roman slaves did everything from hard labor to housework.
Roman slaves did everything from hard labor to housework.
roman craftsman and slaves
Of course they got paid. Would you work for nothing? Some of them were paid very well for their services. Even slaves were given money in the form of tips and bonuses for jobs well done.
yes 1 person could have up 2 about 400 slaves
Slaves did everything.