No. It is entirely the creation of Hollywood scriptwriters.
Infact, Wallace was not even the commander of forces at Stirling Bridge. That honour fell to Andrew Moray, who was the senior Guardian of Scotland, and of far higher social standing than Wallace (who was a very minor noble).
Moray was mortally wounded while leading the scots forces at the Battle of Stirling Bridge, and died a little while afterwards, leaving Wallace to take much of the credit. However, Wallace led the Scots forces for only seven months after the Battle of Stirling, before defeat at Falkirk, after which Wallace resigned the title of Guardian of Scotland.
The Battle of Stirling Bridge in 1297.
Edward killed William Wallace at the battle of Stirling Bridge. Edward then cut of Wallace's head and stuck it on a spike
Victory at the Battle of Stirling Bridge in 1297.
The Scottish Army under the command of William Wallace and Andrew De Moray.
he started to fight for scotland at the battle of stirling bridge in 1297 if you are wondering if the Scots won they did and it was against the english
Wallace was around about 27 years old at the Battle of Stirling Bridge.
Stirling Bridge 1297
William Wallace and Andrew De Moray
The Battle of Stirling Bridge. The Battle of Falkirk.
The Battle of Stirling Bridge in 1297.
Edward killed William Wallace at the battle of Stirling Bridge. Edward then cut of Wallace's head and stuck it on a spike
An army of Scots led by William Wallace.
There was no Battle of Stirling, it was the Battle of Stirling Bridge. There is no evidence that Wallace ever met Robert the Bruce or the French Princess.
it was culloden Yes, is the correct answer, NOT Culloden.
Victory at the Battle of Stirling Bridge in 1297.
The Scottish Army under the command of William Wallace and Andrew De Moray.
he started to fight for scotland at the battle of stirling bridge in 1297 if you are wondering if the Scots won they did and it was against the english