0
Most historians tend to agree with Gibbon's account in his "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" that it began as a result of internal decline of socio-political and military dissension around 230-250 and was complete when the Germanic tribes crossed the Rhine in 406 of the Common Era. There is debate on the actual "fall" as the Eastern Empire, Byzantium, lasted until the invasion by the Ottoman Empire in 1453.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did the praetorian guard have to do with the fall of the roman empire?
The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.The Praetorian Guard had nothing at all to do with the fall of the Roman empire. It had been disbanded by the emperor Diocletian roughly 200 years before the fall of the western part of the empire.
What was once part of the roman empire England turkey Morocco India?
England, Turkey and Morocco were all once part of the Roman empire. India was not, although the Romans had trade relationships with India.England, Turkey and Morocco were all once part of the Roman empire. India was not, although the Romans had trade relationships with India.England, Turkey and Morocco were all once part of the Roman empire. India was not, although the Romans had trade relationships with India.England, Turkey and Morocco were all once part of the Roman empire. India was not, although the Romans had trade relationships with India.England, Turkey and Morocco were all once part of the Roman empire. India was not, although the Romans had trade relationships with India.England, Turkey and Morocco were all once part of the Roman empire. India was not, although the Romans had trade relationships with India.England, Turkey and Morocco were all once part of the Roman empire. India was not, although the Romans had trade relationships with India.England, Turkey and Morocco were all once part of the Roman empire. India was not, although the Romans had trade relationships with India.England, Turkey and Morocco were all once part of the Roman empire. India was not, although the Romans had trade relationships with India.
What is considered as a major cause of fall of the roman empire?
The invasions by the Germanic peoples precipitated the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. They eventually took over all of its lands. The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years.
What is the thesis of the fall of rome?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. Historians have argue for a great number of reasons or factors which led to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. Therefore, there are many theses. There are even historians who argue that this part of the Roman Empire did not fall. Instead, there was a transformation of this part of the empire into a new system of governance and culture. The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What was the fall of Rome all about?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What Problems Did The Germanic Tribes Cause to the roman empire?
The Germanic peoples invaded the western part of the Roman Empire and caused it to fall. They eventually took over all of its lands. The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years.
What is the fall of rome like?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What best summarize the fall of the roman empire?
First of all it has to be clarified that it was the western part of the Roman Empire which fell. The eastern part of this empire continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years. The generalisation about the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire is that it fell under the weight of the invasions by the Germanic people. An invasion of Gaul by the Vandals, Sueves and Alans set in motion a process in which the Romans lost political cohesion and within 87 years, they lost of the lands of this part of the empire to Germanic peoples, including peoples who had been Roman allies.
Why was there a fall in ROme?
There was not a fall in Rome. The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
How did the adoption of Christianity by constintine help the christians of the eastern roman empire?
Once Constantine adopted Christianity and set Christianity as the main Roman religion, he diverted fund which once went to pagan temples to new Christian churches which he had built all across the empire! (A this point the empire was a whole.) Once the funds for the pagan temples stopped, the temples very quickly disperser all over the empire, especially in the eastern parts of the empire! This lead to a very strong Christian presence in the eastern region until the Roman empire completely collapsed.
Did the Greek empire fall before the Roman empire?
Becuase they were weak The Greeks never had an empire. All they were globally were a collection of independent city-states. Alexander the Great tried to establish an empire but at his death it all fell apart. So there is no comparison.
What leadership lessons can be found in the fall of the Roman Empire?
The primary leadership lesson from the fall of the Roman Empire would be to never hire mercenaries to protect your borders. The decline and fall of the Roman empire was a process that took several hundred years. With all deference to the opening sentence, it took a combination of factors that led to the fall of what is termed by many historians as the Western portion of the Roman empire. Certainly leadership was one of the many factors involved with the process, but to quantify it into a single sentence would be incorrect. As an aside, it took Gibbon in the late 1700's 6 full volumes to describe his version of the decline and fall of Rome.
