answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, most of the battles the Romans fought had names. That's so that historians, both ancient and modern, could let us know what tactics or battle stats that they were discussing. Most of the battles were named after the city or area where they were fought, such as the battles of Alesia, Pharsales, Actiuim, etc.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Of course they did. Look them up here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Roman_battles

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Yes, most if not all of the battles had names.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did any of the Roman battles have names?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Are there any machine guns in the roman battles?

Of course not!


Ancient roman fights are called what?

Battles, like any other.


What were the key battles?

key battles are the names of the battles this by me


Who is a famous roman potter?

We do not know any names of famous Roman potters.


Did any of the battles have names?

Of course they did. Look them up here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Roman_battles


How many battles were there in the Roman Colosium?

No battles. There were regular gladitorian fights.


Where were Hannibals major battles?

in Roman


Did any of Romans battles have names?

Of course they did. Look them up here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Roman_battles


What battles was nerva the Roman Emperor in?

lossing


What were poseidon's other names?

Neptune, was the Roman equivalent of the Greek Poseidon. I've never heard of any other names for him.


What conclusion can be drown about roman beliefs?

Chance played a big role in Roman battles.


Did the Romans flood the Roman coliseum for naval battles?

they did