{| |- | Blockades are often very effective. The German attempt to blockade England through a curtain of U-Boats had some major affects on the Allied efforts. It was unsuccessful in preventing goods from getting through, but it slowed the stream to a small trickle and on some occassions threatened to cut it off entirely. |}
The blockade rule in World War I primarily referred to the naval blockades implemented by the Allied Powers, particularly Britain, to restrict the flow of goods and supplies to the Central Powers, notably Germany. These blockades aimed to weaken the enemy's economy and military capabilities by cutting off access to essential resources, food, and munitions. The legality and morality of such blockades were hotly debated, especially regarding their impact on civilian populations. The blockades were a significant factor in contributing to the eventual defeat of the Central Powers.
I've never heard this before, are you asking which war were they more important in, or did someone say they were more important in World War 1. In World War 2 battleship blockades were 54% effective, stopping 54% of trade going into a country can demoralize citizens extremely quickly, versus 22% effectiveness in World War 1
Soldiers ?
Yep
Yes
Your mums breath
jj
in world war 1 the women were used to clean wounds and take care of the injured
millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1
the men were gone to war!
joined the work force
they didnt work out