Want this question answered?
It appears you need to provide more information...the Allies over history had casualties in wars large and small. Feel free to edit the answer for more specifics, and someone will answer it appropriately.
They didn't much, seeing as they won. However, they did take more casualties than they would have liked which contributed to the eventual defeat of Harold's army at Hastings
Hitler hated the communists more then anything else
The North had more casualties but the south had a greater percentage of the total population killed.
The More You Suffer was created on 2003-04-22.
The British had more than 55,000 casualties, and German casualties are estimated at 45,000.
pp
They can't afford to have earthquake proof buildings and so suffer more
In World War 2, Germany suffered more casualties than either Italy or Japan. Only Russia and China suffered more casualties than Germany.
First the Japanese, then the communists; one take's care of a task, "one bite at a time."
Gettysburg, but there were not 50,000 killed, there were 50,000 casualties. Casualties is killed AND wounded. Usually about four wounded for every one killed outright. Some of the wounded will die later, but most will recover, though perhaps not be able to fight any more. So probably somewhere around 10,000 were killed immediately, a few more thousand would die of wounds or infection later, the rest would suffer horribly but eventually live on.
Many countries were involved in World War 1. The casualties of the United States were 321,000. The casualties of Austria-Hungary were 4,820,000. For the French Empire it was 5,651,000. Then Germany had 5,952,000. Great Britain had 2,367,000. Italy had 1,407,000 casualties. The casualties Russia had were 6,650,000. (see the related link for more information)