0
Did many historians feel the death rate during the war was very high because military strategy lagged behind the military technology of the time?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Indeed they didn't until several years after the WW1.
Even the American field commander of the Civil War didn't fully understand the relation in being between the massive employment of rifled guns, rifled cannons, the other new technologies and the very high rate of deaths.
Their professional formation was based upon the tactic concepts of warfare developed during the Napoleonic Era, when those technologies didn't exist or, in case of the rifled muskets had been a rarity and all should have been decided by means of the impact of bayonet assaults carried on by masses of infantry against the enemy deployed in line.
Only after the first two years of war, thanks to the experience made, their basic instruction as engineers and the tactic skill of many of them and the instinctive reaction of the citizen-soldiers who learnt how exploit the terrain to obtain some shelter during the fight, the situation on the battlefield improved a little.
Furthermore, the general Staffs of the European Armies gave but little importance to the Civil War and the experiences made by means of the new technologies.
They carried forward their own obsolete theories with the outcome that all the historians know and therefore we should not be surprised if the scholars and historian could realize the relation existing between the new technologies employed during the American Civil War and the high rate of losses on the battlefield only after more than sixty years.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did technology affect military strategy during the civil war?
The new technology gradually changed military strategy. Because the rifle and the minié could kill far more people than older weapons, soldiers fighting from inside trenches or behind barricades had a great advantage in mass infantry attacks.
What were some new technology used during the civil war and their description?
Civil War Technology led historians to call the American Civil War the first modern war because of the array of new technology with which it was fought. The new technology ranged from weapons to cameras and telegraphs to tin cans. New weapons allowed soldiers to be more effective, but this new technology also meant that more soldiers were killed.
According to Churchill why was the Battle of France lost?
Because of an oversight and Military strategy
Which military leader was known as the Desert Fox?
Field Marshal Erwin Rommel was the "desert fox" of the Africa Corps in Northern Africa for the Nazi Wehrmacht (Army). He was dubbed with that nickname because he was sly like a fox in his military strategy and used camouflage tactics like the real animal of the desert fox.
How do historians generally view populism?
Historians generally view populism as a failure, but a successful one. It was successful because its failure brought about opportunity for some needed reforms.
How did technology affect military strategy during the civil war?
The new technology gradually changed military strategy. Because the rifle and the minié could kill far more people than older weapons, soldiers fighting from inside trenches or behind barricades had a great advantage in mass infantry attacks.
The technology of iron smelting aided the Hittites because?
military stragity
Is information technology a strategy or need?
Information technology is both a strategy and a need. It is a strategy because organizations use IT to achieve their goals and gain competitive advantages. At the same time, it is a need because IT has become essential for businesses to operate efficiently, communicate effectively, and adapt to the ever-changing business environment.
The American strategy for conquering Canada was well conceived but failed because of a lack of equipment and troops?
The cause of the United State's failure to capture Canada because of a lack of military preparedness and poor strategy. Its command structure lacked the ability to mount and win a large invasion. There was confusion on the chain or command and their strategy was ill advised, ending in a military disaster.
China experienced a time of prosperity under the Qing dynasty because of?
increased military technology
What was romes military strategy to conquer Italy?
Rome did not have a military strategy to conquer Italy because she did not have a plan to conquer Italy. Her expansion into Italy was the result of winning several separate wars, sometimes quite apart in history, which were fought for different reasons.
Why is Japan no longer a military power?
Because now Japan focuses on technology and their economy, instead of imperialism.
For what profession in the US was the civil war a turning point?
For battle-centered historians, Gettysburg rules; for strategy-centered historians, Vicksburg was the key.
Allied strategy battle of the bulge?
The Allied Forces did not have a strategy until after they were attacked because the Generals did not believe there was a major offensive going on in the Ardennes. This was to their peril. Since I am not a military strategist and do not know the military lingo I am sending you to some links to help you understand how the Germans and the Allied Forces fought the battle.
How does strategy affect structure?
Strategy affects structure because you have to know how you are going to go at something before it can be accomplished. Structure is a very important feature to have.
Why do historians say that anachronisms are wrong?
Historians think anachronisms are wrong because of their name. "Anachronism" means "out of time" and refers to things that are outside of sequential order. One example of this is use of certain technology in a time period before it is invented.
Why do historians have different interpretations?
Historians have different interpretations because they all have different opinions.
