0
Southern because the Southern had more land and needed more work done on the plantations.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did slave labor make the southern colonies more profitable?
The southern states had more farms and on the farms worked slaves and the farmers made money off of selling the slaves and the slave's labor.
What is a difference between middle and souther colony farms?
Both the Middle and Southern colony farms were fertile in soil but the Southern colonies grew indigo and the Middle more grains.They probably both grew both of these crops but one more than the other.Lastly, the Southern colonies had more slaves. Paulina B.
Why do slave masters need to capture slaves?
Slave masters needed to catch more slaves to make more money. They sold slaves for money. Their wealth was decided by the number and quality of slaves they had in stock. Sometimes, if they had farms, the more slaves that worked on the farms, the better.
How was northern society different southern society?
North of Us: industrialized, small numbers of slaves, mostly traders, factories, factory workers; the South: plantations depending on 3 million black slaves' work.The owners felt themselves as nobles.
How were Northern textile mills and Southern cotton plantations linked?
Southern slaves produced the cotton, and workers at Northern mills (who were paid not much more than slaves) turned it into clothing, bedding, and other items. This was the main reason many Northerners were against abolition: the loss of slave labor would affect not just the South's plantation society, but the North's industrial economy as well.
Did southern farms use more enslaved workers or northern farms?
Yes, in fact, northern farms didn't have slaves. It was the southern states only that used slavery. By 1860 there were 6 million slaves in the southern states.
Did Northern farms or Southern farms use more enslaves workers?
The southern farms had far more enslaved worker than the Northern farms because the Southern had more land and needed more work done on the plantations.
Did northern farms or southern farms used more enslaved workers?
The southern farms had far more enslaved worker than the Northern farms because the Southern had more land and needed more work done on the plantations.
How did the northern and southern resources compare?
If you are talking about the Civil War, then here is your answer. The northern had more industrial resources, meaning factories, etc. However, the southern was more agricultural. They depended on slaves to work in the field. Therefore, they had a lot of cotton and farms.
How did slave labor make the southern colonies more profitable?
The southern states had more farms and on the farms worked slaves and the farmers made money off of selling the slaves and the slave's labor.
Did northern farms or southern farms use more enslaved workers and why?
they loved their faimly
Why did southern colonies increasingly turn toward slavery?
IN the south they had more farms, therefore they needed slaves to run the farms
Why were there less slaves in the southern colonies than in the northern colonies?
The northern colonies had less reliance on plantation agriculture, which required large numbers of slaves, whereas the southern colonies relied heavily on cash crops like cotton and tobacco that necessitated a large labor force. Additionally, the climate and topography of the southern colonies were more conducive to slave labor in agriculture compared to the northern colonies.
How much more efficient than northern farms were farms worked by slaves in the new south?
This question can't really be answered because there are different measures of efficiency, and the farms were operated quite differently. Most northern farms were smaller, family operated, and produced food. The most important southern farms were larger and were dedicated to "cash crops" or "export crops". The biggest of these were tobacco and cotton. In terms of economic efficiency, most northern farms were basically self-sufficient after loans for the purchase of animals and basic tools was completed. Even highly successful southern farms had an inherent inefficiency in that huge amounts of money had to be borrowed for the purchase of slaves. As a result, southern farms could appear highly efficient and profitable, but be terribly in debt. Thomas Jefferson, for example, had a large farm and employed many slaves but was in debt his entire life. Statements that slavery produced economic efficiency are based on assumptions that are not entirely supported by facts. Slavery does not work.
What is a difference between middle and souther colony farms?
Both the Middle and Southern colony farms were fertile in soil but the Southern colonies grew indigo and the Middle more grains.They probably both grew both of these crops but one more than the other.Lastly, the Southern colonies had more slaves. Paulina B.
Why did the northern colonies have fewer slaves than the southern slaves?
The northern colonies had fewer slaves than the southern colonies mainly because their economy did not rely heavily on slave labor for large-scale agriculture like the southern colonies did. The northern colonies also had different industries such as shipping, trade, and manufacturing that did not require as much slave labor. Additionally, the cold climate and rocky terrain in the North were less conducive to large plantations that required a significant number of slaves.
Why do slave masters need to capture slaves?
Slave masters needed to catch more slaves to make more money. They sold slaves for money. Their wealth was decided by the number and quality of slaves they had in stock. Sometimes, if they had farms, the more slaves that worked on the farms, the better.
