Yes, because the king could call upon his knights and nobles to fight a war.
Knights are nobles because they are sons of knights wich are nobles.
balls
the king or nobles and knights and the servants plus family of the nobles and kings
the king or nobles and knights and the servants plus family of the nobles and kings
There both fighters
Knights were nobles so they took care of their estates/manors and fought wars.
They did the odd jobs for knights and were in training to become knights. They were the son's of nobles who showed promise of knighthood.
Feudalism
Knights and nobles
The Nobles and knights - the knights counted too, because if the nobles lost power they would too; the nobles were the ones who paid them, and the nobles were getting powerless, so that was the same for the knights. if the commoners didnt get paid to go to war then it would be a different story. Hope that makes any sense. O(^__^)O
Nobles of the sword would sometimes take a knights place and nobles of the robe would more than likely take the kings place.
king nobles knights peasants