no or yes
no if they were poor they did not go to school. If the children were rich then they could go to school.
Probably not. Remember! The children working in the mines were poor children and the poor children were very lucky to go to any sort of school at all.
Going to school in Victorian times was only for the rich children. This meant that the poor children would hardly mix with the wealthy kids at school.
Their parents paid for them to go to school.
children didnt go to school in Victorian times as schooling was expensive and the vast majority couldn't afford to be educated. money was more important and with money they could feed themselves if nothing else so children were put to work as soon as they could be. hope this helps hun Before the Education act of about 1887, there was no enforced schooling, so if a family were poor, children did not go to school, but went to work instead.
No, poor children did not go to school during Tudor times. During this time period very children went to school or were educated.
they had to go to school or they went to work to sweep chimnys
they had to go to school or they went to work to sweep chimnys
Schools were not free until the end of the Victorian era in 1891
School's were not free until the end of the Victorian era in 1891.
Most of the children go to school at the age of 6 to 7 years of age. Children are not required to go to school and the schools are very poor.
Most children in Victorian England never went to school. They were taught at home and sent out to work to help support the family. School became mandatory in 1880 and children went to school until they were 10.