0
The Romans did want a strong emperor to stop the civil wars that racked the Roman Republic.
What else can I help you with?
Why did the Romans want to have an emperor?
because
Why did rome want to have an emperor?
The Romans did not particularly want to have an emperor, but they accepted the principate as an alternative to the constant civil wars that they had experienced.
Who was Romans first emperor?
Romans first emperor was julius caesar
Who crowned charles emperor of the romans?
The Pope placed a crown on his head and proclaimed him "Emperor of the Romans".
Is an emperor the ruler of an empire?
Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.Initially the Romans were ruled by kings, but they were overthrown. The word "king" was a horror to the tradition conscious Romans. When Augustus came to power he in fact was an emperor, but the Romans never even used the word emperor. Augustus was the "princeps" or first citizen. After Augustus, the Romans used the title "Caesar" for their rulers, never the word emperor. In reality the Romans had both a king and an emperor.
Did the Romans have an emperor?
Yes
Who was Romans first true emperor?
The first Roman emperor was Augustus. However, emperor is a term which has been coined by historians. The term used by the Romans was princeps
When was Otto I crowned emperor of the Romans?
Otto I was crowned emperor in 962.
Who was emperor of the Romans in the year 300 ad?
the emperor in the time and years of 300 AD was Emperor Constantine
Who was called emperor of the Romans by the pope?
Charlemagne
When otto l freed the pope from the control of romans he was named?
When Otto I freed the Pope from the control of the Romans, he was named Holy Roman Emperor.
Did rizal became an emperor of the Romans for a matter of weeks?
There was not an emperor of the Romans called Rizal. Rizal is a Filipino surname. The Philippines are on the other side of the world.
