Given the political and technological realities of the time, it's difficult to imagine a different decision. A new weapons technology theoretically promised to (and did, in actuality) end the war sooner. Dropping the second one could be more open to debate.
Because it ended WWII.
The atom bomb was not in existence during World War One, also known as "The Great War".
The result was it killed 1,000s of people.
August 6 1945............Hiroshima
See atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Dropping of the atom bomb near the end of WWII
Dropping the atom bombs on Nagaski & Hirowskima
japan was warned but the Japanese refused to surrender.therfore on August 6, 1945 an American plane dropped the atomic bomb on hiroshima japan.
The President responsible for the dropping of the atom bomb on Nagasaki, and Hiroshima is: Harry Truman. The reason of this is because the Germans surrendered in 1945 the Japanese could hold the US Army of fighting in the pacific, So Harry Truman decided to end the war quickly using the very powerful atom bomb dropping them on two of japan's cities. Japan soon surrendered after the atom bombs and the war ended.
By dropping an atom bomb on Hiroshima and another on Nagasaki
The Atom bomb was dropped on Hiroshima in 1945
probably would have, but japan did NOT have the atomic bomb...........