answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Miller v California was a Landmark United States Supreme Court case that changes the precedence involving what constitutes unprotected obscenity for First Amendment purposes. The decision reiterated that obscenity was not protected by the First Amendment and established the a test called the Miller Test for determining what material was deemed obscene.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did the case of Miller v California deal with the issues of obscenity and the opinion was written by wareen burger?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Did the case of Miller v. California (1973) deal with the issues of obscenity and the opinion was written by Warren Burger.?

Yes, Miller v. California (1973) dealt with defining obscenity. The opinion in the case was written by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger.


What is the result of miller vs California?

The decision reiterated that obscenity was not protected by the First Amendment and established the Miller test for determining what constituted obscene material.


In Roth v US did obscenity have the protection of the first amendment?

It was ruled 6-3 that obscenity was NOT protected by the first amendment. This, however, was overturned in 1973 by another case, Miller v. California.


What is the legal interpretation of obscenity based on?

U.S. obscenity law is based on the Miller Test that was established by the 1973 Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. California. The three parts of the Miller Test are: whether the average person, in an average setting, would find the work sexual in nature; whether the work demonstrates blatantly offensive sexual behavior as defined by law; and whether the work lacks any redeeming value on any level.


What is legal test for obscenity?

The Miller Test is the current "test" used by Supreme Court Justices for obscenity. It basically states that if a creation has no artistic value whatsoever ("filth for the sake of filth") then it can be considered obscene.


Who wrote the us supreme court's majority opinion in the 1973 miller v California case?

Chief Justice Warren Burger


What has the author Margaret Miller Rocq written?

Margaret Miller Rocq has written: 'California local history' -- subject(s): Bibliography, Local History, Union Catalogs, Union lists


What has the author Loye Miller written?

Loye Miller has written: 'The interpretive naturalist' -- subject(s): Accessible book 'A collection of bird remains fron the Pliscene of San Diego, California'


What has the author Sondra Miller Rubenstein written?

Sondra Miller Rubenstein has written several books, including "The Everything Guide to Social Media," "The Everything Parent's Guide to Special Education," and "The Everything Guide to Homeschooling." She is known for her informative and practical guides on a variety of topics.


When was Tony Miller - California - born?

Tony Miller - California - was born in 1948.


Where can you purchase a Miller Toyota?

Research has shown that Miller Toyota has a few different locations in California. There is a Miller Toyota in Anaheim, California, as well as a Miller Toyota in Culver City, California.


What 1973 US Supreme Court case held that obscenity must be defined by contemporary community standards?

Miller v. California, 413 US 14 (1973)In Miller, the Supreme Court established a three-prong test to determine whether something met the definition of obscenity.For more information, see Related Questions, below.