Depending on the situation and the people involved is what will determine if the compromise failed or worked. Usually when one is attempting to compromise with another, there has to be a balance of give and take for it to be successful.
They made the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850.
The vast new territories ceded from Mexico invalidated the Missouri Compromise that had kept the peace for thirty years. So a new compromise had to be worked out, and this one did not last.
The forthcoming admission of California as a state of the Union - it was too big to fit the terms of the Missouri Compromise, so a new compromise had to be worked out.
Lincoln was too anxious to compromise with the South.
The Crittenden Compromise failed because it outlawed slavery in western states because Abraham Lincoln opposed the western expansion of slavery.
Roger Sherman of Connecticut worked out a compromise that he hoped would satistfy both small and large states.
verything worked iut
Henry Clay ended the Nullification Crisis.
Clay and Calhoun worked out a compromise tariff.
The original Compromise of 1850 failed to pass the Senate. Stephen Douglas helped Henry Clay by dividing the Compromise into 5 smaller bills and was able to push the bills through the Senate.
he failed to keep the whig party together and was in favor of the slave issue missouri compromise
Yes. That Compromise worked well for thirty years, until the new territories acquired from Mexico required a new Compromise.