verything worked iut
Yes - according to the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case.
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Supreme Court of Missouri was created in 1841.
The second highest court in the states of Missouri is the Federal Court of Missouri. The highest court in Missouri is the Supreme Court of Missouri.
The Supreme Court verdict in the Dred Scott case declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. So this invalidated both the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850.
The Missouri supreme court is 207 west high street
(cause they were confused or something)- .... _this was the privous responce to this question which gave me no help so i decide to help. In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress did not have authority to prohibit slavery in territories, and that those provisions of the Missouri Compromise were unconstitutional. It found that under the admission act of Missouri, that blacks and mulattos did not qualify as citizens of the United States.
The Missouri Compromise was illegal; therefore, Dred Scott was free.The Missouri Compromise was legal; therefore, Dred Scott wasn't free.The Missouri Compromise was illegal; therefore, Dred Scott wasn't free.The Missouri Compromise was legal; therefore, Dred Scott was free.
the Supreme Court ruled that enslaved individuals were not citizens of the United States and did not have the right to sue in federal courts. Additionally, the Court stated that the Missouri Compromise, which banned slavery in certain territories, was unconstitutional.
Supreme court justices decide if laws are constitutional.
The constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise was a subject of debate. Some argued that it violated the principle of states' rights, while others believed it was necessary to maintain the balance between free and slave states. Ultimately, the Compromise was overturned by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision.