(cause they were confused or something)- .... _this was the privous responce to this question which gave me no help so i decide to help.
In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress did not have authority to prohibit slavery in territories, and that those provisions of the Missouri Compromise were unconstitutional. It found that under the admission act of Missouri, that blacks and mulattos did not qualify as citizens of the United States.
The Missouri Compromise.
It was only unconstitutional if you accepted Roger Taney's interpretation of the Constitution in his judgment of the Dred Scott case in 1857. He said the Constitution protected slavery - so therefore no state could declare itself to be free soil.
If a law is decided to be against the Constitution, the Supreme Court will declare it unconstitutional.
Who can declare laws unconstitutional
The Judicial Branch can declare an act of the President unconstitutional.
Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)The court case was Dred Scott v. Sandford, in 1857.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The judicial branch, specifically the Supreme Court, can declare laws unconstitutional.
The judicial branch can declare acts unconstitutional and can also declare laws unconstitutional.
The Judicial Branch has the power to declare the acts unconstitutional.
no
The Judaical branch
Yes. The Judicial Branch can declare a law unconstitutional, and it can declare presidential actions unconstitutional.