no they facked up each other in the
No, Akbar was not a Mongol leader; he was a Mughal emperor. Akbar promoted religious tolerance and actively engaged with people of different faiths. He did not force Hindus to become Muslims.
No, Akbar was known for religious tolerance and policies that promoted unity among different faiths. He abolished the jizya tax on non-Muslims, allowed Hindus to practice their religion freely, and even married a Hindu princess. He did not force Hindus to become Muslims.
gurn or sage
white
It is a country in Asia and was made in 1947 when the leader of the Muslim league in India demanded a breakaway state, thus Pakistan was made in 1947 to prevent a war between the Muslims and the Hindus.
Muslims do not have one leader, like a pope. There are many many scholars who are well-respected by most Muslims, though.
No
Some say he forced politics to or he would kill them, this is rubbish he was choosen because he was a good leader
Allah is the spiritual leader of muslims.
Perhaps you have Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi or Mahatma Gandhi in mind, but Gandhi was not only a leader of hindus. He was a leader to the whole of India, for hindus, muslims, sikhs, christians, as well as others. He was assassinated on 30th January, 1948.
A kafir can not lead Muslims. Only a Muslim can lead Muslims.
Saladin led the Muslims in some of the Crusades.