Yes, the north had more railroad tracks then the South. This is because the North needed the railroads to connect the cities with the other cities and small towns. The North also needed more railroad tracks because the North was in charge of transporting goods that the South grew. Since the North had more railroads then the South, the North had an advantage when the Civil war came along because they could transport troops guicker.
The North and a more extensive railroad network than did the South during the US Civil War. Northern rail tracks were tat least double the miles of rail lines available to the South. This gave the North a vast advantage in transporting troops and supplies. Although the South had less railroad track, some historians believe that the South utilized what they had in a more efficient way.
The North had a better rail system then the north, The south used more rivers then rails in the civil war
The North was much more industrialized, having many industries, such as textiles, revolve around factories. In contrast, the South was still very agricultural, having many plantations as well as small farms. The North also had many more miles of railroad track.
The South
north - more railroad, a bigger population, more factories for weapons(ammuntion, ect), more ships, and a stronger government. South-very experienced military leaders, defending land not attacking.
The North and a more extensive railroad network than did the South during the US Civil War. Northern rail tracks were tat least double the miles of rail lines available to the South. This gave the North a vast advantage in transporting troops and supplies. Although the South had less railroad track, some historians believe that the South utilized what they had in a more efficient way.
It depends on the time period. At one point there was right around 2.4 times more railroad track in the north than in the south. In 1861, the north had about 22,000 miles of track and the south had 9,500 miles of track.
north has more railroads than south
The North had a better rail system then the north, The south used more rivers then rails in the civil war
North had more railroads which was an advantage to move people and supplies.
first of all you are wrong, the life in the south was harder by transportation than the north was. In the 1800s in the south there was over 10,000 miles of railroad track's north had a better transportation way in everything, more railroads, roads, and canal's, the north was filled exceptionally with canal's. The south only had a few good and easy ways of transportation.
The North was much more industrialized, having many industries, such as textiles, revolve around factories. In contrast, the South was still very agricultural, having many plantations as well as small farms. The North also had many more miles of railroad track.
The south had more miles of railroad then the north in the 1860's
The North was much more industrialized, having many industries, such as textiles, revolve around factories. In contrast, the South was still very agricultural, having many plantations as well as small farms. The North also had many more miles of railroad track.
The North was much more industrialized, having many industries, such as textiles, revolve around factories. In contrast, the South was still very agricultural, having many plantations as well as small farms. The North also had many more miles of railroad track.
The North had less farm machinery than the South.
The north had more railroad systems, had a huge population advantage so the south was out-numbered, and they had more resources. Theres more than one to choose from for you.