This is a more complicated question than you would think.
In the end while the South probably spent more money, but the North built more war supplies by far and equipped more troops.
So what it comes down to: what does your teacher want to hear? The North was able to produce and deploy significantly more material and troops and that is what made the difference in the war.
they spent a little over 300,000 confrederacy money
the money they had were shillings and fathers to spend on clothes
almost 3 mil.
Near what is now Bismark and Mandan North Dakota. They spent the winter with the Mandan Indians and where they met Saqajawea
Spend it.
The differences between the North and the South were that North was anti-slavery, and the South was pro-slavery. The North had more resources, men, and money to spend than the South did.Ê The South was farming and plantation crops, and the North was more refined cities while the Northern states were more politically Republican, and the Southern states more Democratic.
The North's military spending to $3.2 Billion. Funds to use in the war came from income taxes, war bonds and exports of wheat. The North far out spent the South, which was based primarily on the problems the South had in raising funds.
they spent a little over 300,000 confrederacy money
On a per capita basis, the South spent $111 based on its population. As for the North, the per capita spending was $98. The basic reason for the South's higher amount was due to the smaller population it had in comparison to the North.
they feel if they spend more money on a football stadium it will bring in more money !
France is to the North and Spain is to the South. Andorra is a landlocked country. They speak Catalan and spend Euros.
none because they dont have money.
i cant spend money to watch zebras, and elephants..
They sat in their offices, talked and complained anout the North.
How much money DO you spend?
Yes, but HIGHLY unlikely. In a civil case the state is under no obligation to spend the taxpayers money to transport and guard the incarcerated individual involved in a civil trial.
no,it should spend its money to help the poor,create jobs to reduce poverty in our country.