Want this question answered?
Slaves were treated poorly in the South, were it was legal. They were free in the north.
Of course they were slaves. But during the civil War, they were treated very badly in the south because of discrimination. Some slaves were even killed for trying to run away. In the north, they were not slaves but still discriminated.
they were treated bad
Slaves in the south were treated poorly because they often disobeyed their owners by refusing to work.
South
the north is in the upper part and adn the south is in the lower part that's why it's important to separate the north from south my gash
Slaves were treated poorly in the South, were it was legal. They were free in the north.
Of course they were slaves. But during the civil War, they were treated very badly in the south because of discrimination. Some slaves were even killed for trying to run away. In the north, they were not slaves but still discriminated.
they were treated bad
Slaves in the south were treated poorly because they often disobeyed their owners by refusing to work.
South
During Reconstruction, many black slaves stayed in the South after the Civil War. With the exception of being enslaved, they were often treated the same as they had before they were freed. Slaves who migrated to the North were on the whole treated better.
south wont slaves the north did not
The south treated their slaves much more fairly than the deep southern states. (South example: North Carolina) (Deep South example: Georgia, South Carolina) Maryland treated their slave fairly, and they were considered a northern state.
The South
The South had more than the North, and the abolishment of slavery began in the North. But the South wanted slaves - thus ensued the Civil War.
By 1890, there had been no slaves in the south for 35 years.