the poor bread was healthier
Rich Tudors have nicer food, clothing and lifestyle.
The Rich and Poor wore different clothes , ate different food , played with different toys therefore this means the Rich had more money in the bank account
Yes they did. They ate the same types of food.
rich poor have food don't have food can play have a job
The food for rich is poor people(their mind and body) and for poor people whatever they afford to get,not when they are hungry but when it is available.. By-Sagar
They celebrated Christmas just the same as us but had very little food if you were poor. If you were rich you would have Roast pork.
There is all kinds of Greeks poor and rich Greeks so it depends on the house the poor ones live in a house by mud and stone and the rich ones like in a apartment.
There was no diet for the rich or the poor Aztecs.
food
Rich Romans lived in amazing houses poor Romans didn't. Rich Romans ate delectable food poor Romans didn't rich Romans had money poor ones didn't rich ones didn't work poor ones did but there is a difference between poor Romans and slaves were people who were very poor and were owned. and if you want to learn the difference between slaves and rich people or poor people and slaves i recommend going on to wikipedia it is a very advanced website that has about 20 A4 pages about every single precise subject.
food
For the rich: Anything that isn't fast food now. For the poor: Anything that is.