What is the differences between de'jure and de'facto standards ?
De facto standards are widely accepted in practice, while de jure standards have been officially established by a governing body or authority. De facto standards evolve naturally through common usage, whereas de jure standards are often mandated through laws or regulations.
A de facto standard is one that is taken to be a general rule by circumstance. A du jour standard is strictly written out as a law.
De facto segregation results from social and economic factors, such as housing discrimination, unequal access to education, and unequal economic opportunities. It is not mandated by law like de jure segregation, but it still leads to the separation of racial and ethnic groups in society.
A de jure method of census count provides a legal basis for counting individuals residing in a specific geographic area, ensuring accurate representation and allocation of resources. It helps in determining citizenship status, enforcing voter eligibility, and upholding legal rights. This method also helps in identifying individuals who are legally required to participate in the census.
Custody may be characterized as 'de facto' or as 'de jure'. A 'de facto' custody refers to the custodial arrangement that 'in fact' is in effect. This arrangement may or may not tally with a 'de jure' custody. A 'de jure' custody refers to the custodial arrangement that is approved according to the particular standards and systems of law.
jure power = legislation ;facto power=justice
De jure refers to something being based on law or formal authority, while de facto refers to something being based on actual practice or reality. In some situations, there can be a misalignment between de jure and de facto, where something is legally mandated (de jure) but not followed in practice (de facto).
"De jure" means "concerning law" while "de facto" means "concerning fact". A state may be de jure sovereign without being de facto sovereign, because a greater nation maintains economic or political hegemony over them, as Syria did with Lebanon. Or vice versa: de facto sovereign without being de jure sovereign, like the tribal areas of Pakistan.
De facto means in fact, and de jure means in law. De Jure slavery would refer to legalised slavery. De facto slavery would not be in a legal sense, but would be the situation nonetheless.
The Latin phrase 'de facto' means 'in or according to fact'. The phrase 'de jure' means 'in or according to law'. In terms of government, a 'de jure' government describes a government that's recognized by and in accord with legal standards and systems. A 'de facto' government describes the government that actually is operating and being respected as the ruling body. Ideally, the two phrases describe the same government in the same area. For example, the Taliban became the 'de facto' and the 'de jure' government in much of Afghanistan for the time period 1996-2001. Prior to and since those years, the Taliban has been the 'de facto' but not the 'de jure' government in areas where its supporters, representatives and organizers hold power.
"de facto" means the person who is serving in that position, or as "in fact"; whereas "de jure" means the person who is legally entitled to perform that function, or "by law", and has the right to perform a function or hold an office; it is important to note that hundreds of years ago, women did not have certain rights, and their husbands would perfom the functions for them, although there are other latin terms for that.
De facto in 1901, de jure in 1953.
De jure standards are standards that have been approved by standard bodies, professional organizations, industry groups, a government body, or other groups.
The term 'de facto' refers to what actually, in fact is in effect. The term 'de jure' refers to what is supposed to be in effect, in accordance with legal requirements and standards. A corporation that is described as 'de facto' means that it's being run in such a way that its owners and its directors aren't the same as those that are so identified in the legal documents.
De jure discrimination refers to discrimination that is mandated by law, such as racial segregation policies in the past. De facto discrimination refers to discrimination that exists in practice, even if not specifically mandated by law, such as racial disparities in education or employment. Examples of public policies designed to address de jure discrimination include civil rights legislation, while policies to address de facto discrimination may include affirmative action programs.
Standards: These consist of specific low level mandatory controls to ensure and control consistency.Guidelines: These consist of recommended, non-mandatory controls that assist the standard when no mandatory control has been specified. These can be considered Best-Practice.