1) PM is traditional, routine, maintenance-oriented, administrative function whereas HRD is continuous, on-going development function aimed at improving human processes. 2) PM is an independent function with independent sub-functions. HRD follows the systems thinking approach. It is not considered in isolation from the larger organization and must take into account the linkages and interfaces. 3) PM is reactive, responding to demands as and when they arise. HRD is proactive, anticipating, planning and advancing continuously. 4) PM is the exclusive responsibility of the personnel department. HRD is a concern for all managers in the organization and aims at developing the capabilities of all line managers to carry out the personnel functions. 5) The scope of PM is relatively narrow with a focus on administering people. The scope of HRD views the organization as a whole and lays emphasis on building a dynamic culture. 6) Important motivators in PM are compensation, rewards, job simplification and so on. HRD considers work groups, challenges and creativity on the job as motivators. 7) In PM improved satisfaction is considered to be the cause for improvedperformance but in HRD it is the other way round (performance is the cause and satisfaction is the result
jdjdjd
becuase formal communication is more important then informal, becuase your communication will be received, but when your informal communication may received or not.
The wording of the announcement would be the biggest difference between an informal and a formal announcement. An informal announcement doesn't have to be as proper and politically correct as a formal announcement would need to be.
Formal and informal communication serve different roles. Formal communication takes longer to develop and is often used to document procedures, requirements, and policies. Informal communication smoothes the day-to-day running of the organization.
Communication can be categorized into formal and informal communication. The three types of formal communication are horizontal communication, upward communication and downward communication.
difference between formal organization structure and informal organization structure.
explain the difference between formal and informal risk assessments
Formal communication follows strict organizational rules and requires much time and cost, unlike the informal communication. Informal communication does not follow any organizational rules, doesnÕt have the corporate formalities and requires less time and cost.
formal and informal rhythm
There is no formal slang. Slang is informal language.
Formal is polite, informal is rude and obnoxious.
what is formal and informal communication
Formal diction is more professional and follows grammatical rules, while informal diction is more relaxed and conversational, often using slang or colloquial expressions. Formal diction is typically used in academic or professional writing, while informal diction is more common in everyday communication.
formal is smart informal isn't smart
Formal observations are planned, structured, and systematic observations that follow a specific protocol or method, such as a checklist or rubric. Informal observations are more relaxed, spontaneous, and subjective observations that may not follow a specific structure or method. Formal observations are often used in research or evaluations, while informal observations are more commonly used in everyday situations or interactions.
difference between informal business bookkeeping and formal business bookkeeping in there stock
jdjdjd