Indentured servants worked for a predetermined amount of time, normally 7 years, to repay passage to the new world. A slave was owned and would never be free and their children would never be free.
No. Indentured workers were very early in colonial history and slaves replaced them as workers.
They used indentured servants.
Theoretically an indentured servant can eventually become free after he's worked long enough.
New England had indentured servants
There never were slaves in NY, but there were indentured servants at first. Later, they faded out.
Slaves are owned by other people. Indentured servants signed a 7 year contract and were free people.
A benefit for indentured slaves is that they get their trip payed. They just need to work off the amount of years to pay back.
Indentured servants were cheaper to employers compared to slaves.
When the colonies required indentured servants or slaves it was to do the work. The first slave arrived in Jamestown in 1609 and after tobacco got a start in the colony workers were needed. Indentured servants didn't work out as well, so more slaves were brought in than indentured servants.
New York had indentured servants and slaves.
Slaves could be worked longer and harder and treated poorer than indentured servants, making them a financially better deal for the owners. In addition, as the laws changed, the children of slaves became slaves themselves. Indentured servants would move on when their debt was paid.
slaves and indentured servants were first brought to north American to work producing