There is no irony between the three fifths compromise and the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution. The former act was based on the number of slaves that existed in a State for the purposes of counting a State's population and therefore its number of seats in the Hose of Representatives. This was clearly put aside as the amendment abolished slavery.
The people want what they want!
The 18th amendment banned alcohol and started prohibition. Instead of repealing 18th amenment, the 21st amendment was passed.
2/3 of each chamber of Congress must approve it, and then it must be ratified by the favorable votes of 3/4 of the state legislatures.
The Compromise of 1850 - allowing California to join the Union as free soil, and passing the Fugitive Slave Act to appease the South.
1.)new age of women 2.)world war 2
Because it is open to change constantly either by ratifying the Constitution with a new amendment or by repealing an existing amendment.HOPE THIS HELPZ!
Republic Act No. 9293 is an amendment to Republic Act. 7836, which covers the professionalism of Filipino teachers. This amendment details the qualifications and registration of different teachers, exceptions, special permits, repealing, and the affectivity of this provision.
Only the 21st Amendment (repealing the 18th) was ratified by conventions in the states.
You create another amendment repealing one of the previous. :)
That would be the amendment repealing prohibition. The 18th amendment established prohibition, and the 21st repealed it. However, to say that these amendments had no impact on the Constitution is not correct. The 18th amendment became part of the Constitution as truly as any other part, and the 21st did also. This had a major impact on the Constitution, and on the people as well.
The Twenty-First Amendment to the United States Constitution repeals the "Prohibition Amendment," (the Eighteenth) banning the importation, sale, or consumption of alcohol in the United States. The final states to ratify the amendment were Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Utah, on December 5, 1933. The Carolinas both rejected the repealing of the amendment, South Carolina going so far as not to call a convention to debate the issue.
If you mean by the president, or by the executive branch, no. There is a pretty intense process to repealing, as well as ratifying an amendment, because amendments are pretty much ultimate law. I pretty much gave you a dumbed down version, you can also read the constitution.