0
archaeological source is about history.
Literary source is about book
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Anonymous
Archaeological sources are physical objects or remains (such as artifacts, structures, and ancient tools) that provide evidence of past human societies, while literary sources are written texts that offer insights into historical events, beliefs, and traditions. Archaeological sources are tangible, while literary sources are more interpretive and can provide details on culture and societal norms not typically found in artifacts.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources why?
Literary sources can provide valuable insight into people's beliefs, customs, and daily life, but they may be subjective or biased. Archaeological sources provide tangible evidence of past societies and can offer more objective information about material culture and social practices. Both types of sources are valuable, and using them together can provide a more comprehensive understanding of history.
What are the different archaeological sources of India?
Archaeological sources in India include artifacts, inscriptions, monuments, coins, and buildings dating back to different historical periods. These sources provide crucial insights into the material culture, societal structures, and religious practices of ancient Indian civilizations. Excavations at sites like Mohenjo-Daro, Harappa, and Hampi have yielded valuable archaeological evidence that helps in understanding India's rich cultural heritage.
How do archaeological sources help in reconstructing in Indian history?
Archaeological sources such as artifacts, ruins, inscriptions, and human remains provide material evidence that helps in understanding the chronology, culture, and lifestyle of ancient Indian civilizations. By analyzing these sources, historians can reconstruct the economic, social, and religious aspects of Indian history, supplementing and enriching the information available from textual sources. Additionally, archaeological findings can offer insights into trade networks, technology, urban planning, and artistic achievements, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of India's past.
What is the difference between a primary source and a artifact?
What is the difference between a primary source and an artifact? a. Primary sources are studied by archaeologists; artifacts are studied by historians. ... Primary sources are written sources; artifacts are objects.
What three tool do historians use to help them answer quistions from the past?
Historians use primary sources, secondary sources, and archaeological evidence to help answer questions from the past. Primary sources are firsthand accounts or direct evidence from the time period being studied, while secondary sources are interpretations or analyses of primary sources. Archaeological evidence includes physical remains such as artifacts, structures, and landscapes.
How are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources?
nhi pata mujhe>>!!
Are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources why?
Literary sources can provide valuable insight into people's beliefs, customs, and daily life, but they may be subjective or biased. Archaeological sources provide tangible evidence of past societies and can offer more objective information about material culture and social practices. Both types of sources are valuable, and using them together can provide a more comprehensive understanding of history.
Debate on literary sources are more useful than archelogical sources for writing history?
literary sources are more useful than archaeological sources for writing history
What are the two archaeological sources in ancient Indian history?
the sources of modern history of India were the literary sources like manuscripts,scrolls , books ,important documents etc.;the second would be archaeological sources and monuments and the third would be other sources like printing machine,photographs,reports.radio broadcasts etc.
What are the sources of modern history?
the sources of modern history of India were the literary sources like manuscripts,scrolls , books ,important documents etc.;the second would be archaeological sources and monuments and the third would be other sources like printing machine,photographs,reports.radio broadcasts etc.
What are Sources of modern Indian history?
the sources of modern history of India were the literary sources like manuscripts,scrolls , books ,important documents etc.;the second would be archaeological sources and monuments and the third would be other sources like printing machine,photographs,reports.radio broadcasts etc.
What are the types of archaeological sources?
the important archaeological sources of studying history include monuments and sites, inscriptions, edicts, tools, and weapons and cultural evidences.
What are the sources of modern India?
archaelogical sources avaible to us include temples,palaces,mosques,forts,tombs,coins,inscriptions,utencils,tools weapons,ornaments and paintings.they give us an idea of the political,social and ecnomic historyof that time.
What are the sources for information on the ancient Hebrews?
old testament and archaeological questions
What are the different types of archaeological source?
the important archaeological sources of studying history include monuments and sites, inscriptions, edicts, tools, and weapons and cultural evidences.
What has the author Morten H orning Jensen written?
Morten H orning Jensen has written: 'Herod Antipas in Galilee: the literary and archaeological sources on the reign of Herod Antipas and its socio-economic impact on Galilee' -- subject(s): OUR Brockhaus selection, Bible
What is the Common sources of literary allusion in the English language?
Usually the main sources are mythology and Bible, also different political events, a literary work, a well-known song, etc.
