Yep!
Most all Rights can be considered Property Rights. You body is your property. You do not have to ask to exercise a Right. You need permission to exercise a privilege. You have a Right to Property. For example... You could develop your land, build a house, grow food, store fuel for heat. You spend months or years of your life on this work. How can someone take it from you? It is the fruits of your labor. You have a Right to the Fruits of your Labor. The same goes for your job. You get the privilege of working for an employer by contract. You have a Right to Contract. The employer has the Right to his property, the job. You have the Right not to take the job and look for another.
new immigrants
You should title all property as joint tenants with the right of survivorship or as tenants by the entirety.You should title all property as joint tenants with the right of survivorship or as tenants by the entirety.You should title all property as joint tenants with the right of survivorship or as tenants by the entirety.You should title all property as joint tenants with the right of survivorship or as tenants by the entirety.
The four basic rights of the capitalist system is the right to own private property, the right to own a business and keep all the business's profit, the right to freedom of competition, and the right to freedom of choice.
economic rights
No, an executor cannot sell estate property without obtaining approval from all beneficiaries.
The executor has the duty to preserve the estate in all aspects, including making money for it. The heirs' consent is not necessary.
The executor is responsible for executing the will. The approval of the beneficiaries is not a requirement.
The first question is "Is there property in the state of nature?". Not all philosophers agree. Such a "right to property" is absent in Hobbes but it is asserted by John Locke. The latter defined the original aquisition of property as the mingling of labor with natural things which results in the production of a good. Locke, said that every person has herself as property: you own yourself by nature. By producing a good through labor you also own that good. This is so for Locke even in the state of nature. To your question why is property (in the Lockean sense) not protected in the state of nature, there is a simple answer: who is there to protect it? All you have is yourself and whatever forces you can muster up. But there is no police, courts or legal system to protect property rights.
It probably is NOT lawful, since all personal items are the property of their owners - AND - since phone companies trace, assess, and charge the phone owners usage, it COULD be charged as "Theft of Services" or Taking Property Without Right" or "Petit Larceny."
communism
No.