This controversial topic can have a number of possible answers.
Answer # 1There are the 'five freedoms' which are now recognized internationally as the foundation of all animal welfare thinking.Although these are the basis of animal welfare, it is still difficult to determine where the fine line lies, and laws are yet to take these matters seriously.
Answer # 2"The question is not, Can they reason? Nor, Can they talk? But can they Suffer? Jeremy Bentham, English Barrister - 1789 (Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation)"
It seems that many people think not. Some people have no regard to God's creatures. I hope this will change soon. All we can due is advocate for these creatures.
Answer # 3While animals deserve reasonable protection against abuse, they do not have legal "rights" in the same way humans do. The US courts have upheld the concept that with the granting of rights also comes the responsibility of duties. Since animals cannot reasonably be expected to carry out any duties, they are also accordingly denied rights.This does not give humans any legal standing in cases of abuse. In the same way animals cannot have rights, humans DO have duties and responsibilities. In the same way that most US communities do not allow a person to have a poorly kept, extremely unkempt or dangerous residence, humans are not allowed to abuse animals to the point of starvation, thirst, disease, and/or death.
Cases of alleged abuse are normally handled by local law enforcement with the possible assistance of animal welfare agencies.
Yes. Animals are God's creatures. Animals do not have rights, some have a few, but not enough. God created the animals and we, human's, just go around killing them. We, human's, need to stand up and fight to give animal's rights!
Animals rights equals human rights:
"If you have men who will exclude any of God's creatures from the shelter of compassion and pity, then you have men who will deal likewise with their fellow men."
- St. Francis of Assisi
Of course they do! They are living creature that lives!
Of course they do! So why are you living then? Are you not a murderer since you need to eat formerly living things? Being alive in itself is not a prerequisite to anything except auto catalyst. In order to have morals you must have two parties capable of upholding, defending, and utlizing the right and I have yet to see animals debating.
Yes i think that animals should have rights because we are just another species of animals.
There are associations that protect animals.
No. Animals (at least the ones known so far) do not have the concept of human rights.
Because Jews disagree about everything. However, Jews do not disagree that animals have rights; they only disagree on what those rights are.
The concept of "rights" is foreign to animals, just ask one. Treat animals with respect, and admire them for their beauty. Realize the fact that there is a food chain. The animals do.
Animals should not have Human Rights BEFORE or IF we ever invent a device that can help us communicate with them.
yes
They believe in animal rights and care about animals.
Ofcourse!! Every living creature has rights. Just as you have the right to live life on your own terms, wild animals too have the right to live as they want. But, sadly, today, we humans are restricting the rights of animals.
Some Animal Rights as stated by The People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals (PETA) :- Animals are not ours to eat- Animals are not ours to wear- Animals are not ours to experiment on- Animals are not ours to use for entertainment- Animals are not ours to exploit in any way
All animals have rights the problem is observing them.
Of course they can't there not HUMAN. Animals have rights too you know.