answersLogoWhite

0

No. The Bill of Rights protects unarmed citizens from being fired on by soldiers.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Are Filipino people who serve in US Armed forces given the same pension right as US citizens?

Yes they are


How many soldiers in Afghanistan right now?

There is not a specific number I can think of. But I do have to say, probably over 10 or 20 thousand armed U.S. soldiers. But hey, at least Osama Bin Laden is dead.


What do you believe the 2nd amendment address a well armed militia meaning the national guard or the right that every citizen has the right to bear arms?

First, you need to define "militia". The Militia is the body of adult citizens that are NOT part of the Armed Forces (National Guard is part of the Armed Forces). Please note that when the 2nd Amendment was written, there WAS no National Guard.


Slogan for approving the constitution?

Some slogans for ratification of the constitution are:Don't deny, ratify!Nothing will preserve liberty but down right forceAn armed nation is a free nationA right delayed is a right deniedAn unarmed society is a society that must live in fear of government!Enslavement is lie old age. It creeps up on you.God created man - the Constitution keeps them equal.


What was the action called when British troops fired into a group of protesters?

Bloody Sunday, aka, Bogside Massacre, which happened on the 30th January 1972, Derry, Northern Ireland. 13 unarmed civil right protesters were killed by soldiers.


When did Soldiers of the Right happen?

Soldiers of the Right happened in 1989.


Did George Washington say when government takes away citizens right to bear arms it becomes citizens right to take away governments right to govern.?

There is no credible evidence that George Washington specifically said, "when government takes away citizens' right to bear arms, it becomes citizens' right to take away government's right to govern." This phrase is often attributed to various interpretations of the Second Amendment and the Founding Fathers' views on government and individual rights. However, it does not appear in Washington's writings or speeches. Washington did emphasize the importance of armed citizenry for defense and liberty, but the exact wording in question is not directly linked to him.


In 1775 who was right the loyalists or patriots during the Boston massacre?

It was the patriots--Actually, it's a lot more controversial than that. The Patriots weren't that innocent, either. They were calling British troops names and pelting rocks at them. Some soldiers panicked and fired. The colonists had a right to be angry, but to throw things at them then later saying that the soldiers fired at unarmed protesters is a little strange. I'm not picking a side here, I'm just trying to prove that not everything the Patriots did was right or rational, in this case.


What is a right for citizens?

no.


Is the right to vote the most important right granted to US citizens?

Freedom of speech/religion


Non citizens of India have Which fundamental right?

Non Citizens have the basic fundamental rights such as Article 14-Right to Equality and Article 21- Right to Life, the other fundamental right are only available to the citizens of India.


What specific right enjoyed by full citizens was denied to partial citizens as Rome expanded?

A specific right of a full citizen of Rome that was not granted to partial citizens was the right to hold public office.