Want this question answered?
Civil law
The federal courts here numerous types of court cases. A few of the cases are maritime law, copyright cases, patent cases, and bankruptcy.
Cases in federal court must involve federal law and since all federal law must be derived from the constitution then yes they do involve constitutional matters.
Federal.
In most cases it is a violation of the law. But there are exceptions. It is best to check with local law authorities.
Any offense committed in violation of state law.
An analogy between breach and violation is that both involve breaking a rule, law, or agreement. A breach typically refers to breaking a contract or duty, while a violation can refer to any infringement of rules or laws. Both breach and violation can have legal consequences.
Cases have to involve a federal law,( Federal Question jurisdiction) or be between residents of different states (Diversity jurisdiction)
The Maritime Injury Law Center has experience in general admiralty law and maritime personal injury law. It handles cases that deal with maritime personal injury claims and admiralty law. It also handles cases that involve sports injuries or boating accidents.
The analogy for breach and violation is that a breach is like breaking through a barrier, while a violation is like breaking a rule or law. Both involve some form of transgression, but breach typically refers to a physical or literal breach, while violation refers to a more abstract breaking of a standard or expectation.
Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases that involve federal law. There are also a few jurisdiction issues that could bring a state law case into federal court.
"Ex Post Facto relates to a change in the law (or the penalties for violation of a law) after a crime has been committed. In most cases, criminal law does not take into consideration what is basically a retroactive change in the law in effect at the time a crime was committed."