Epic heros hitherto have not denounced society. They often have had to undergo the severe test of, which they are most devoted to, their family or their society, like the dilemma faced by SreeRaama in The Raamaayana. Odesseus practically lost family for society. Beowulf never got time to enjoy the pleasures of being with the loved ones in his family. It can never be said that epic heros in the poems written upto now have ever denounced or rejected society. However it is not a rule prescribed anywhere and to be followed blindly by authors. Tomorrow someone somewhere may write an epic featuring the most negative of characters.
I have read a book name epic and it explains of a wonderful poets about heros.
Vulnerability is not typically associated with epic heroes, as they are often depicted as powerful and larger-than-life figures who overcome great challenges.
There are many various qualities that aren't associated with an epic hero, some of which would be:They are willing to betray their comrades for the greater good.They are only looking out for themselvesThey are looking to get richThey reject society.
No, they borrowed from the Greeks and in Ancient Rome there were no "epic heros or stories " , but the Gods were considered real and to be worshipped. In modern times did they become "epic".
Yes
It does not reflect the creator's ideas about the values of the society in which the epic is written or created only the values of the society in which the epic is set.
It is an epic.
reject society, retuen to monke
The Indian Hindu society
embodies the values of a society
The Epic of Gilgamesh
epic