No way if he does then more then 80% of the men of the world are doing something wrong by staying intact. They know that the foreskin is an integral part of the way the penis works and is important to its maintenance it is also a powerful erogenous zone of the body and makes sex better and more stimulating to the woman. They see circumcision as "simple male genital mutilation". There are no legitimate reasons for the amputation of the foreskin except in rare circumstances.
Men don't have to be circumcised. there are no medical reasons for this procedure to take place
Circumcision is done in some cultures and are seen as a religious requirement in some religions
80% of the men in the world are intact and view circumcision as genital mutilation. Modern opinion on this practice suggests that the trauma and pain involved in the circumcision of newborns leads to distinct changes in the brain of the child. Circumcision is a definite no no as well if you want good performance from the penis.
Many that have had this damage inflicted on them as children will say that they do many on the other hand will say that the would have proffered that their genitals had been left alone when they were children. Less then 20% of the men of the world are circumcised and most of these are done for religious reasons over the last hundred and fifty years some are done ostensibly for medical reasons even though modern medical advice states that there is no health advantage in the practice. In the main men are not circumcised as they have control over their own destiny's. However children have no say in it and without the foreskin during their lives have nothing to compare with.
No, there is no medical need for any man to be circumsized, except if as a cure to a condition such as phimosis.
Then you will never need to be circumcised.
No. (and people really don't need to be either)
Boys are not born as circumcised or not circumcised. Circumcision is a surgical procedure. As a minor, it is something that your parents would have to decide to have done. If you are not circumcised, it is because they did not choose to have the procedure done. This would in all likelihood mean that they are already quite aware. There is no need to explain to them. However, if you think that it is something that you want done, you would need to have that talk with the separately.
more people on the planet are uncircumcised than circumcised. Therefore more gay men are uncircumcised.
No. As with any other aspect of Judaism, even non-Jews are welcome to study. Generally males only need to be circumcised if they wish to convert to Judaism.
He is definitely circumcised
Yes he might have been circumcised.
That would be a hard question to answer without asking him personally however the odds are reasonable that even though he is Jewish that he is not. here are many Jewish Europeans that do not recognise the need to be circumcised.
A guys opinion on what exactly?
I did, I had all my sons circumcised. My father did not have his son circumcised. (Me) I had to have it done myself.
I am not use what it means when been circumcised as a large. When a boy is born they parents have a choice to get him circumcised.
The skin on the shaft of the penis extends over the head. All males are born with foreskin and for religious reasons or parents choice some are circumcised, the foreskin is removed.