0
Yes, if appropriate precedents exist for the case before the court. The US Supreme Court sets binding precedents, meaning lower courts are required to adhere to them (but don't always do so) under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand).
What else can I help you with?
What type of courts can make precedents?
In most legal systems, higher courts, such as supreme courts or appellate courts, have the authority to establish precedents. These precedents are binding on lower courts within the same jurisdiction, guiding future cases with similar legal issues. In some jurisdictions, administrative courts may also create precedents within their specific areas of law. However, trial courts typically do not create binding precedents, although their decisions can influence future cases.
Are there courts controlled by the US Supreme Court?
Not directly. The US Supreme Court is the highest federal appellate court in the United States. Lower courts are supposed to follow precedents set by the Court's decisions, but the Supreme Court doesn't exercise operational control over the lower courts.
What court sets the binding precedents for federal courts?
Supreme Court
What are the Hierarchy of precedent in Tanzania?
In Tanzania, the hierarchy of precedent is structured primarily around the court system. At the top is the Supreme Court, whose decisions are binding on all lower courts. Below the Supreme Court are the Court of Appeal and High Court, which provide binding precedents for subordinate courts. Finally, the District and Primary Courts follow, where decisions can be persuasive but are not binding on higher courts.
The US supreme court and state supreme courts are known as courts of?
The U.S. Supreme Court and state supreme courts are known as courts of last resort. They serve as the highest judicial authority within their respective jurisdictions, primarily handling appeals and interpreting constitutional and statutory law. Their decisions are final and set binding precedents for lower courts. Ultimately, they ensure the uniform application of law across the nation or state.
The doctrine of stare decisis binds judges to follow the prior decisions of?
The doctrine of stare decisis binds judges to follow precedents set by higher appellate courts under which jurisdiction the particular lower court falls.For example, in the federal court system US Supreme Court decisions create binding precedents for all US District Courts and US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts; however, Circuit Court decisions only set binding precedents for the US District Courts within their territorial jurisdiction.The exception to this is decisions of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has nationwide jurisdiction (below that of the Supreme Court) over special subject-matter cases.
About 1 4 th of the supreme courts decisions concern appeals from?
About 1 4 th of the supreme courts decisions concern appeals from District Courts
Which level of court in US is superior?
In the U.S. legal system, the Supreme Court is the highest and most superior level of court. It has the ultimate authority to interpret the Constitution and federal law, and its decisions set binding precedents for all lower courts. Below the Supreme Court are the Circuit Courts of Appeals and the District Courts, with the Circuit Courts serving as appellate courts for the District Courts.
What might happen if decisions of the Supreme Court were not final?
Cases would be tied up in the appellate courts forever, and there would be few established precedents on which to base a decision. Chaos and gridlock.
What is the name for a Supreme Court decisions that will be used to decide future cases?
US Supreme Court opinions (decisions) set binding precedents because all lower courts are required to follow the same reasoning when deciding similar cases under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand).
Are Texas trial courts decisions binding on the Texas Supreme Court?
No. The decisions of the Texas Supreme Court are binding on trial courts in Texas. That is why it is called the Supreme Court.
What are examples to be followed in similar cases as they arise in lower courts or reach the supreme court?
Precedents
