In Tanzania, the hierarchy of precedent is structured primarily around the court system. At the top is the Supreme Court, whose decisions are binding on all lower courts. Below the Supreme Court are the Court of Appeal and High Court, which provide binding precedents for subordinate courts. Finally, the District and Primary Courts follow, where decisions can be persuasive but are not binding on higher courts.
All court decisions are binding unless overturned by a higher court.
Supreme Court
No
No, Congress cannot override decisions made by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and its decisions are final and binding.
In the U.S. legal system, the Supreme Court is the highest and most superior level of court. It has the ultimate authority to interpret the Constitution and federal law, and its decisions set binding precedents for all lower courts. Below the Supreme Court are the Circuit Courts of Appeals and the District Courts, with the Circuit Courts serving as appellate courts for the District Courts.
No, that's backwards. Binding precedents are set from the top-down.US Supreme Court decisions are binding on all relevant federal (and state) courts.US Court of Appeals Circuit Court decisions are binding only on US District Courts within that Circuit.US District Court decisions are not binding on any other Courts.Non-binding precedents, including dissenting opinions, may be cited as persuasive precedents at any level, however.
Yes, the Supreme Court can and does disagree with the verdicts of lower courts, including the courts of appeals. When a case is appealed to the Supreme Court, it reviews the legal issues and interpretations made by the appellate court. The Supreme Court has the authority to overturn or affirm these decisions, establishing binding precedent for lower courts. Disagreements often arise from differing interpretations of the law or the Constitution.
US Supreme Court decisions are binding on all federal courts, but are most likely to be applicable to cases heard in US District Courts or appealed to US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts. The Supreme Court's decisions are also binding on State courts if they involve constitutional amendments that have been incorporated to the states.US Court of Appeals Circuit Court decisions are binding on all US District Courts within that Circuit, but only carry persuasive precedential weight in other Circuits. The decisions are not binding on other Circuits or on any state courts. US District Court decisions are not binding on other courts, but may be cited as persuasive precedents by other courts, regardless of which Circuit the court belongs to.When US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts issue conflicting decisions on substantially similar matters (called a Circuit Split), they may induce the US Supreme Court to grant certiorari for a case that can be used to resolve or clarify the constitutional issue. The Supreme Court decision will then create a binding precedent used in deciding similar future cases.When Circuit Splits are unresolved, the individual decisions -- although conflicting -- remain binding within each Circuit, but not outside the Circuit. This raises the possibility that one or more of the other ten regional Circuits* will further complicate matters by creating a third split, resulting in inconsistent constitutional interpretations and application of law. For this reason, reviewing cases that address Circuit Splits are high on the US Supreme Court's list of priorities.* The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has special subject matter jurisdiction and is less likely to be affected by decisions made in the regional Circuits.
No, the Supreme Court reviews decisions of lower (inferior) courts under its appellate jurisdiction.
The U.S. Supreme Court and state supreme courts are known as courts of last resort. They serve as the highest judicial authority within their respective jurisdictions, primarily handling appeals and interpreting constitutional and statutory law. Their decisions are final and set binding precedents for lower courts. Ultimately, they ensure the uniform application of law across the nation or state.
The doctrine of stare decisis binds judges to follow precedents set by higher appellate courts under which jurisdiction the particular lower court falls.For example, in the federal court system US Supreme Court decisions create binding precedents for all US District Courts and US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts; however, Circuit Court decisions only set binding precedents for the US District Courts within their territorial jurisdiction.The exception to this is decisions of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has nationwide jurisdiction (below that of the Supreme Court) over special subject-matter cases.