Oh yes, non-democratic governments are even more prone to corruption than democratic governments are.
No, human rights issues can occur in both nondemocratic and democratic countries. While nondemocratic regimes often face criticism for blatant violations, democratic nations can also experience human rights challenges, such as discrimination, police brutality, and restrictions on free speech. Therefore, the protection and promotion of human rights is a global concern that transcends political systems.
iran pakistan and myanmar
Some nondemocratic countries do not allow political cartoons.
India Pakistan Singapore Greece
There are nondemocratic countries, like Russia, Cuba, and North Korea
They have no such obligation.
Cuba, chile venezuela, ecuador, peru.
from the start corruption is one of the serious case we often face. and corruption started in people because of there eagerness and greediness in power and in money, we all know money results to evil. money manipulates people that is why corruption is really unwanted not only in the Philippines but in some other countries.
from the start corruption is one of the serious case we often face. and corruption started in people because of there eagerness and greediness in power and in money, we all know money results to evil. money manipulates people that is why corruption is really unwanted not only in the Philippines but in some other countries.
imperialists
The two terms are necessarily opposite. Democratic is defined as supporting democracy and/or its principles, while nondemocratic is that which does not support or espouse democratic principles.
Some countries that have made progress in addressing government corruption include Denmark, New Zealand, Finland, Sweden, and Singapore. These countries are known for having strong institutional frameworks, transparency, and accountability measures in place to prevent and combat corruption.