No.
Nuclear power is more efficient because nuclear power is used as splitting atoms, making big bursts of energy, whereas coal power is simply burning coal. So nuclear power uses uranium fission to create energy (electricity), whereas coal power burns coal, emitting carbon.
(Mind you, nuclear energy leaves behind radioactive waste - that is arguably easier to deal with for the time being. Not to mention that accidents at nuclear plants can have devastating environmental effects.
coal is black nuclear is purple
It depends what type of power plant. A coal-burning power plant will produce CO2 and SO2, which are both pollutants. Nuclear power plants and geothermal power plants produce steam, which is not a pollutant. There are many other types of power plants, but most produce CO2 and SO2 or steam.
Coal fired power plants,Petroleum power plants,
Sulfur Dioxide is given off by coal-burning power plants
yes
Coal Power plants are cheaper to build.
from the process of the coal getting into electricty
Coal Power plants are cheaper to build.
Coal fired plants.
Not really. You receive 100 times as much radiation from coal power plant pollution than you do from nuclear power plant leaks.
coal uses fossil fuels and nuclear power plants doesn't
Nuclear, coal-fired, and hydroelectric power plants provide electricity.
Nuclear power plants were made in the hope of providing a more efficient source of electricity than is obtained from coal powered plants.
Zero percent of nuclear power plants make energy by coal, US or otherwise.
Coal fired, Nuclear Power, Gas Fired, Hydro, Wind Power.
Nuclear or atomic reactors are a way to create electrical energy. If they are run properly, they do not pollute the air like coal plants.
There are none, Because we use coal or gasoline to power our generators.