Well, of course they have the moral and ethical obligations inherent in being human, in being citizens of a country, and in being leaders. What exactly those obligations are is in question though. Different people have different opinions about it.
a meeting of members or leaders or a political party tomake plans,choose candidates,or decide how to vote a meeting of members or leaders or a political party tomake plans,choose candidates,or decide how to vote
In the Jeffersonian democracy presidential candidates would be chosen by caucuses that were held by political leaders. In a Jacksonian democracy the candidates would be chosen by conventions.
true
differentiations between effective leaders and ethical leaders
Political leaders are often guided by principles such as honesty, integrity, transparency, and accountability. They may also consider principles of fairness, justice, empathy, and respect for human rights in their decision-making processes. Additionally, the principle of serving the greater good and promoting the well-being of society as a whole can also play a role in shaping their actions.
The national committee assigns leaders to go to certain states to help campaign for their party's candidate, especially in states where the opposition may be stronger.
Three
Three
Three
Since Israel has no official state religion, its political leaders are not religious leaders, and its religious leaders are not political leaders, in contrast to some other countries in the region and elsewhere.
It is not ethical for an organization to allow its leaders to use fear as a communication tactic because that kills staff morale and self drive.
As we set certain qualifications for any job and expect the person coming for that job would abide by that qualification's, similar things should be followed by the leaders of any political parties. The Party should see to it