because they were overthrown by their people
true
Tyrants usually preceded democracy. They were appointed in various cities by popular will to get rid of the aristocratic cliques and run a city-state to the general benefit of the people rather than the vested interested of a few. A tyrant had to maintain a bodyguard to protect himself from the aristocrats, and to hire them had to impose a tax on the people, which eventually made the tyrant as unpopular as the aristocrats had been. So the cities progressively expelled the tyrants and some tried the experiment with democracy - with mixed success. Failures with democracy resulted in some cases in a return to aristocrats, monarchs or tyrants to sort out the mess. Most cities then turned to a compromise of a form of limited democracy where the magistrates allowed the people to vote yes or no on issues they put before them.
the tyrants overthrew the nobles
Rome had no tyrants. The tyrants were a Greek form of government.
some of the tyrants' ways were similar to that of democracy. tyrants let other people besides nobles to have a say in government, like in democracy.
some of the tyrants' ways were similar to that of democracy. tyrants let other people besides nobles to have a say in government, like in democracy.
y
Yes
true
because they were overthrown by their people
true
The answer is Treason
I think it was tyrants myceans
Tyrants effectected how the people would live. They some times destroyed them. They would make the city-states do what he/she wants by force.
Tyrants usually preceded democracy. They were appointed in various cities by popular will to get rid of the aristocratic cliques and run a city-state to the general benefit of the people rather than the vested interested of a few. A tyrant had to maintain a bodyguard to protect himself from the aristocrats, and to hire them had to impose a tax on the people, which eventually made the tyrant as unpopular as the aristocrats had been. So the cities progressively expelled the tyrants and some tried the experiment with democracy - with mixed success. Failures with democracy resulted in some cases in a return to aristocrats, monarchs or tyrants to sort out the mess. Most cities then turned to a compromise of a form of limited democracy where the magistrates allowed the people to vote yes or no on issues they put before them.
Uh firstly I don't think china has emperors anymore and second no because they were snoby tyrants who treated their people like crap