Yes.
There is a lot of evidence that they do, indeed, exist.
There is enough evidence for black holes - I don't see any problem there.
I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.
Whoever said this seems to think that there is not enough direct evidence for black holes. However, I understand there is enough evidence to believe that black holes actually exist - including the observation of many, many objects that can only be black holes.
Black holes do exist - they are just VERY difficult to detect.
White holes are theoretical regions of spacetime that expel matter and energy outward, the opposite of black holes which pull matter in. They do not suck up objects like black holes do. However, there is no observational evidence for the existence of white holes in the universe.
The scientific consensus does not support Stephen Hawking's assertion that black holes do not exist. Black holes are widely accepted in the scientific community based on observational evidence and theoretical predictions.
It is a tricky question because black holes are invisible, but scientists know that they are exist because black holes distort light, so it kind of change the light and also it sucks everything into it, so when scientists see stars starting to disappear, thats mean there is a black hole.
It is a tricky question because black holes are invisible, but scientists know that they are exist because black holes distort light, so it kind of change the light and also it sucks everything into it, so when scientists see stars starting to disappear, thats mean there is a black hole.
The evidence on black holes is actually quite convincing; I suggest you read the Wikipedia article for details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#Observational_evidence
White holes are theoretical objects that are the opposite of black holes, expelling matter instead of absorbing it. They are not considered to be dangerous like black holes, as they do not have the same gravitational pull or ability to trap objects with their intense gravitational force. White holes are not thought to exist in our universe.
The lack of direct evidence for black holes poses a challenge for scientists because black holes, by their nature, do not emit any light or radiation that can be easily detected. Instead, researchers must rely on indirect observations and theoretical models to infer the presence of black holes. This makes it difficult to conclusively prove their existence through direct observation.