0
I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.
I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.
I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.
I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.
What else can I help you with?
Why is the lack of direct evidence for black holes a problem for scientist?
The lack of direct evidence for black holes poses a challenge for scientists because black holes, by their nature, do not emit any light or radiation that can be easily detected. Instead, researchers must rely on indirect observations and theoretical models to infer the presence of black holes. This makes it difficult to conclusively prove their existence through direct observation.
How is math related to black holes?
The concept of a black hole was first discovered mathematically in 1916 through the equations of Einstein's general relativity. Using mathematics scientists were able to figure out many of the properties and behaviors of black holes before the end of the 1960s. The first direct psychical evidence of a black hole was not found until the late 1970s.
Where have black holes been found?
Scientists predict that there are over one million black holes in our galaxy
How was the black hol discovered?
The concept of black holes was first proposed by physicist John Michell in 1783, but the actual discovery of a black hole took several decades. In the 20th century, scientists like Karl Schwarzschild and Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar made significant advances in understanding the theoretical aspects of black holes. However, the first observational evidence for a black hole came in 1971 with the discovery of a strong radio source known as Cygnus X-1. Further observations and studies confirmed that Cygnus X-1 was a binary system consisting of a black hole and a companion star.
How can scientists determine the mass of a black hole?
Scientists can determine the mass of a black hole through various methods, including observing the orbits of objects around the black hole, analyzing the gravitational lensing effects of the black hole on light, and studying the X-ray emissions from material falling into the black hole. These observations help scientists calculate the mass of the black hole based on the influence it has on its surroundings.
Why is the lack of direct evidence for black holes a problem for scientists?
There is enough evidence for black holes - I don't see any problem there.
Why is the lack of direct evidence for black holes a problem for scientist?
The lack of direct evidence for black holes poses a challenge for scientists because black holes, by their nature, do not emit any light or radiation that can be easily detected. Instead, researchers must rely on indirect observations and theoretical models to infer the presence of black holes. This makes it difficult to conclusively prove their existence through direct observation.
Do scientists have x-ray evidence that black holes exist?
Yes.
How is math related to black holes?
The concept of a black hole was first discovered mathematically in 1916 through the equations of Einstein's general relativity. Using mathematics scientists were able to figure out many of the properties and behaviors of black holes before the end of the 1960s. The first direct psychical evidence of a black hole was not found until the late 1970s.
What does it mean that black holes are theory?
Whoever said this seems to think that there is not enough direct evidence for black holes. However, I understand there is enough evidence to believe that black holes actually exist - including the observation of many, many objects that can only be black holes.
Why is lack of evidence for black holes a problem for scientists?
There is no shortage of evidence that black holes exist, and as such it is not a problem! The "problem" is a misconception that we cannot "see" black holes in the traditional sense. Usually surrounded by clouds of dust and particles (accretion disks) our vision is technically obstructed of the object. However, science has excellent ways of expanding beyond our own limited senses. By mapping objects being sucked into the area and the gravitational disturbance on nearby objects, we can see clearly that there is something there. Given the gigantic gravitational pull, and the fact that we can't "see" any light coming from the object itself, there is literally nothing as massive as a star that can pull so strongly on nearby objects without it being a star, except for a black hole (or of course a neutron star).
Is there a black hole in the milky way?
Scientists are now largely convinced that there is indeed one at the centre of the galaxy... the evidence indicates a compact high-mass object there; if it's not a black hole, we don't know what else it could be.
Why are black market a problem?
Why are black markets a problem
Is the reproduction of black bears direct or indirect?
Direct.
Was George Washington black?
There has been no direct evidence presented to show that George Washington had a black son, or any children at all. There has been talk that he did have a son with a young black slave who was called Venus. But no evidence has been presented to confirm that.
What are Louis vuitton evidence lens color?
Hi. Louis Vuitton Evidence black-like a black gradient tint...dark at the top, transparent near the bottom. Louis Vuitton Evidence red- a greyish-black gradient tint Louis Vuitton Evidence white- a black gradient tint Louis Vuitton Evidence brown- a brown gradient tint
Is dying of consumption the same as dying from turberculosis?
The truth is, no one knows. The majority of scientists believe that consumption is the same as tuberculosis, but because the term was used so long ago, the scientists have no evidence to prove what the disease was in modern day terms. the same goes for the "Black Death" and the bubonic plague
