0
There is no shortage of evidence that black holes exist, and as such it is not a problem! The "problem" is a misconception that we cannot "see" black holes in the traditional sense. Usually surrounded by clouds of dust and particles (accretion disks) our vision is technically obstructed of the object. However, science has excellent ways of expanding beyond our own limited senses. By mapping objects being sucked into the area and the gravitational disturbance on nearby objects, we can see clearly that there is something there. Given the gigantic gravitational pull, and the fact that we can't "see" any light coming from the object itself, there is literally nothing as massive as a star that can pull so strongly on nearby objects without it being a star, except for a black hole (or of course a neutron star).
What else can I help you with?
Why is the lack of direct evidence on black holes a problem for scientists?
I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.I am not sure it is a problem. The evidence for black holes is quite strong.
Why is the lack of direct evidence for black holes a problem for scientists?
There is enough evidence for black holes - I don't see any problem there.
Do scientists have x-ray evidence that black holes exist?
Yes.
Why is the lack of direct evidence for black holes a problem for scientist?
The lack of direct evidence for black holes poses a challenge for scientists because black holes, by their nature, do not emit any light or radiation that can be easily detected. Instead, researchers must rely on indirect observations and theoretical models to infer the presence of black holes. This makes it difficult to conclusively prove their existence through direct observation.
Are black holes known?
Yes, black holes are known and regarded by many scientists, astronomers, and physicists.
What scientists have their name to researching of black holes?
Steven Hawking is researching black holes right now.
Where have black holes been found?
Scientists predict that there are over one million black holes in our galaxy
Do white holes suck up objects like black holes do?
White holes are theoretical regions of spacetime that expel matter and energy outward, the opposite of black holes which pull matter in. They do not suck up objects like black holes do. However, there is no observational evidence for the existence of white holes in the universe.
What does it mean that black holes are theory?
Whoever said this seems to think that there is not enough direct evidence for black holes. However, I understand there is enough evidence to believe that black holes actually exist - including the observation of many, many objects that can only be black holes.
What do scientists what to know more about in space?
Black holes
How does a black holes acquire greatest mass?
Most black holes are stellar mass black holes with masses comparable to those of large stars as they form from the collapse of massive stars. Scientists know of the existence of supermassive black holes that are millions to billions of times the mass of our sun and can be found in the centers of most galaxies. Scientists still do not know how these black holes become so massive.
Will black holes exist?
There is a lot of evidence that they do, indeed, exist.
