No yes no yes no yes no yes no yes... I DON'T KNOW!!! No yes no yes no yes no yes no yes... I DON'T KNOW!!!
No bones, no backbones. That is why they have a shell.
No, they are invertebrates (no backbone), and mollusca (shell bearing creatures).
No, As Animals With Backbones Are Called Vertebrates, Whereas Snails DON’T Have Backbones So They Are Invertebrates, Meaning They Don’t Have Backbones.
No, snails do not have a backbone; they are invertebrates.
if youre into spiders, bugs or snails they have no backbone
No, snails are mollusk. They have no backbone and are therefore not mammals.No, snails are not mammals.
No, they do not have a backbone and are considered to be invertebrates.
The Answer would be invertebrate : ) ... !
totally!!they hav a short backbone but a backbone none-the-less
A lobster does not have a backbone they are a crustacean which has shells
Animals that do not have a backbone. Such as snails, insects, worms, etc.
By definition, invertebrates. Worms, jelly fish, snails, insects.
no mammals are invertebrate. Panda is a vertebrate, that is it has got a backbone. Invertebrates are: snails or shells.
An invertebrate is an animal that does not have a backbone or spine. These include insects as well as worms and animals like snails.
No, an octopus is an invertebrate, having no backbone, nor indeed any bones. It has a beak, however, and a vestigial shell remnant from its descent from mollusks. Other mollusks include the squid, oyster, and snails.